ArticleGenetics2020
Gene Knock-Ins in
Article in Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-omic mapping of Drosophila protein secretomes reveals tissue-specific origins and inter-organ trafficking.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Genetic engineering for SIT application: a fruit fly-focused review.Insect science · 2026Review
- Review
- Heat shock-optimized CRISPR/Cas9 system for visible clonal analysis and mutant generation in Drosophila.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- A disordered linker in the Polycomb protein Polyhomeotic tunes phase separation and oligomerization.Molecular cell · 2025Article
- Article
- Establishment of CRISPR/Cas9-based knock-in in a hemimetabolous insect: targeted gene tagging in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Expanding theeLife · 2024Article
- In vivo activities of heparan sulfate differentially modified by NDSTs during development.Proteoglycan research · 2024Article
- Molecular and functional characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster conserved smORFome.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Demonstration of in vivo engineered tandem duplications of varying sizes using CRISPR and recombinases in Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in inGene and genome editing · 2023Article
- Changes in locus wide repression underlie the evolution of Drosophila abdominal pigmentation.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- split-intein Gal4 provides intersectional genetic labeling that is fully repressible by Gal80.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- A toolkit for converting Gal4 into LexA and Flippase transgenes in Drosophila.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- New advances in CRISPR/Cas-mediated precise gene-editing techniques.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023Review
- Article
- Demonstration ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- "A fly appeared": sable, a classic Drosophila mutation, maps to Yippee, a gene affecting body color, wings, and bristles.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- State-of-the-art CRISPR for in vivo and cell-based studies in Drosophila.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Targeted genomic knock-ins are a valuable tool to probe gene function. However, knock-in methods involving homology-directed repair (HDR) can be laborious. Here, we adapt the mammalian CRISPaint [clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-assisted insertion tagging] homology-independent knock-in method for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.