Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2019
The impact of the Sepsis-3 definition on ICU admission of patients with infection.
Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical utility of biomarkers for outcomes prediction in adults with suspected sepsis presenting to the emergency department: a synthesis of current evidence.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase in Sepsis Combined with Kidney Dysfunction or Urinary Tract Infection: A Prospective Observational Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Epidemiology, management, and outcome of infection, sepsis, and septic shock in a German emergency department (EpiSEP study).Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- SOFA Score as a Reliable Tool to Detect High Risk for Venous Thrombosis in Patients With Critical Stage SARS-CoV-2.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Role of qSOFA and SOFA Scoring Systems for Predicting In-Hospital Risk of Deterioration in the Emergency Department.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated inflammation following an infection. However, the impact of this definition on patient care is not fully clear. This study investigated the impact of the current definition on ICU admission of patients with infection.
methodsWe performed a prospective observational study over twelve months on consecutive patients presented to our emergency department and admitted for infection. We analyzed the predictive values of the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score, the SOFA score and blood lactate regarding ICU admission.
resultsWe included 916 patients with the diagnosis of infection. Median age was 74 years (IQR 62-82 years), and 56.3% were males. There were 219 direct ICU admissions and 697 general ward admissions. A qSOFA score of ≥2 points had 52.9% sensitivity and 98.3% specificity regarding sepsis diagnosis. A qSOFA score of ≥2 points had 87.2% specificity but only 39.9% sensitivity to predict ICU admission. A SOFA score of ≥2 points had 97.4% sensitivity, but only 17.1% specificity to predict ICU admission, while a SOFA score of ≥4 points predicted ICU admission with 82.6% sensitivity and 71.7% specificity. The area under the receiver operating curve regarding ICU admission was 0.81 (95 CI, 0.77-0.86) for SOFA score, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.48-0.61) for blood lactate, and only 0.34 (95% CI, 0.28-0.40) for qSOFA on emergency department presentation.
conclusionsWhile a positive qSOFA score had a high specificity regarding ICU admission, the low sensitivity of the score among septic patients as well as among ICU admissions considerably limited its value in routine patient management. The SOFA score was the better predictor of ICU admission, while the predictive value of blood lactate was equivocal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.