Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31685006›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2019

The impact of the Sepsis-3 definition on ICU admission of patients with infection.

Jenny Klimpel, Lorenz Weidhase, Michael Bernhard, André Gries, Sirak Petros

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jenny KlimpelMedical ICU, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Lorenz WeidhaseMedical ICU, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael BernhardEmergency Department, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
André GriesEmergency Department, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Sirak PetrosMedical ICU, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. sirak.petros@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2345-756X
University Hospital Leipzig · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated inflammation following an infection. However, the impact of this definition on patient care is not fully clear. This study investigated the impact of the current definition on ICU admission of patients with infection.

methodsWe performed a prospective observational study over twelve months on consecutive patients presented to our emergency department and admitted for infection. We analyzed the predictive values of the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score, the SOFA score and blood lactate regarding ICU admission.

resultsWe included 916 patients with the diagnosis of infection. Median age was 74 years (IQR 62-82 years), and 56.3% were males. There were 219 direct ICU admissions and 697 general ward admissions. A qSOFA score of ≥2 points had 52.9% sensitivity and 98.3% specificity regarding sepsis diagnosis. A qSOFA score of ≥2 points had 87.2% specificity but only 39.9% sensitivity to predict ICU admission. A SOFA score of ≥2 points had 97.4% sensitivity, but only 17.1% specificity to predict ICU admission, while a SOFA score of ≥4 points predicted ICU admission with 82.6% sensitivity and 71.7% specificity. The area under the receiver operating curve regarding ICU admission was 0.81 (95 CI, 0.77-0.86) for SOFA score, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.48-0.61) for blood lactate, and only 0.34 (95% CI, 0.28-0.40) for qSOFA on emergency department presentation.

conclusionsWhile a positive qSOFA score had a high specificity regarding ICU admission, the low sensitivity of the score among septic patients as well as among ICU admissions considerably limited its value in routine patient management. The SOFA score was the better predictor of ICU admission, while the predictive value of blood lactate was equivocal.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPrognosisProspective StudiesROC CurveSepsisEmergency departmentInfectionIntensive careMortalityqSOFASepsisSOFA score

Identifiers

PMID31685006
PMCPMC6829802
OpenAlexW2986456164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.