Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31684977›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2019

Implementation of a behavioral medicine approach in physiotherapy: a process evaluation of facilitation methods.

Johanna Fritz, Lars Wallin, Anne Söderlund, Lena Almqvist, Maria Sandborgh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna FritzSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, SE-721 23, Västerås, Sweden. johanna.fritz@mdh.se.ORCID 0000-0002-4616-521X
Lars WallinSchool of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Anne SöderlundSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, SE-721 23, Västerås, Sweden.
Lena AlmqvistSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, SE-721 23, Västerås, Sweden.
Maria SandborghSchool of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, SE-721 23, Västerås, Sweden.
Mälardalen University · SEDalarna University · SEMälardalen University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a quasi-experimental study, facilitation was used to support implementation of the behavioral medicine approach in physiotherapy. The facilitation consisted of an individually tailored multifaceted intervention including outreach visits, peer coaching, educational materials, individual goal-setting, video feedback, self-monitoring in a diary, manager support, and information leaflets to patients. A behavioral medicine approach implies a focus on health related behavior change. Clinical behavioral change was initiated but not maintained among the participating physiotherapists. To explain these findings, a deeper understanding of the implementation process is necessary. The aim was therefore to explore the impact mechanisms in the implementation of a behavioral medicine approach in physiotherapy by examining dose, reach, and participant experiences.

methodsAn explorative mixed-methods design was used as a part of a quasi-experimental trial. Twenty four physiotherapists working in primary health care were included in the quasi-experimental trial, and all physiotherapists in the experimental group (n = 15) were included in the current study. A facilitation intervention based mainly on social cognitive theory was tested during a 6-month period. Data were collected during and after the implementation period by self-reports of time allocation regarding participation in different implementation methods, documentation of individual goals, ranking of the most important implementation methods, and semi-structured interviews. Descriptive statistical methods and inductive content analysis were used.

resultsThe physiotherapists participated most frequently in the following implementation methods: outreach visits, peer coaching, educational materials, and individual goal-setting. They also considered these methods to be the most important for implementation, contributing to support for learning, practice, memory, emotions, self-management, and time management. However, time management support from the manager was lacking.

conclusionsThe findings indicate that different mechanisms govern the initiation and maintenance of clinical behavior change. The impact mechanisms for initiation of clinical behavior change refers to the use of externally initiated multiple methods, such as feedback on practice, time management, and extrinsic motivation. The lack of self-regulation capability, intrinsic motivation, and continued support after the implementation intervention period were interpreted as possible mechanisms for the failure of maintaining the behavioral change over time.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAdultBehavioral MedicineFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMentorsPatient Care PlanningPatient-Centered CarePatient Education as TopicProcess Assessment, Health CareQualitative ResearchSwedenClinical competenceImplementation scienceKnowledge translationPhysiotherapyPrimary health careSelf-regulationSocial learning theory

Identifiers

PMID31684977
PMCPMC6827232
OpenAlexW2985293170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.