ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2019
Detecting compensatory movements of stroke survivors using pressure distribution data and machine learning algorithms.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technology-Based Compensation Assessment and Detection of Upper Extremity Activities of Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- Tai Ji for stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial on improving upper limb function and cortico-muscular coupling in stroke patients.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Trial
- Markerless On-Device Detection of Compensatory Movement Patterns in Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Exercises from Monocular RGB Video: A Validation Study in Healthy Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Validation of a Multimodal Wearable Device Integrating EMG and IMU Sensors for Monitoring Upper Limb Function During Tooth Brushing Activities of Daily Living.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Upper limb compensatory strategies across tasks with an ultrasound-controlled prosthesis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Virtual reality for activities of daily living rehabilitation after acquired brain injury.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Electromyographic and Kinematic Analysis of the Upper Limb During Drinking and Eating Using a Wearable Device Prototype.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Classifying Residual Stroke Severity Using Robotics-Assisted Stroke Rehabilitation: Machine Learning Approach.JMIR biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- PSA-FL-CDM: A Novel Federated Learning-Based Consensus Model for Post-Stroke Assessment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Responsiveness to exoskeleton loading during bimanual reaching is associated with corticospinal tract integrity in stroke.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Article
- Home-based upper limb stroke rehabilitation mechatronics: challenges and opportunities.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Review
- Automatic Post-Stroke Severity Assessment Using Novel Unsupervised Consensus Learning for Wearable and Camera-Based Sensor Datasets.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Development of a compensation-aware virtual rehabilitation system for upper extremity rehabilitation in community-dwelling older adults with stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Online detection of compensatory strategies in human movement with supervised classification: a pilot study.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2023Article
- Compensatory movement detection by using near-infrared spectroscopy technology based on signal improvement method.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Improved spatial-temporal graph convolutional networks for upper limb rehabilitation assessment based on precise posture measurement.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Deep learning-based behavioral profiling of rodent stroke recovery.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Online compensation detecting for real-time reduction of compensatory motions during reaching: a pilot study with stroke survivors.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCompensatory movements are commonly employed by stroke survivors during seated reaching and may have negative effects on their long-term recovery. Detecting compensation is useful for coaching the patient to reduce compensatory trunk movements and improving the motor function of the paretic arm. Sensor-based and camera-based systems have been developed to detect compensatory movements, but they still have some limitations, such as causing object obstructions, requiring complex setups and raising privacy concerns. To overcome these drawbacks, this paper proposes a compensatory movement detection system based on pressure distribution data and is unobtrusive, simple and practical. Machine learning algorithms were applied to classify compensatory movements automatically. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop and test a pressure distribution-based system for the automatic detection of compensation movements of stroke survivors using machine learning algorithms.
methodsEight stroke survivors performed three types of reaching tasks (back-and-forth, side-to-side, and up-and-down reaching tasks) with both the healthy side and the affected side. The pressure distribution data were recorded, and five features were extracted for classification. The k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms were applied to detect and categorize the compensatory movements. The surface electromyography (sEMG) signals of nine trunk muscles were acquired to provide a detailed description and explanation of compensatory movements.
resultsCross-validation yielded high classification accuracies (F1-score>0.95) for both the k-NN and SVM classifiers in detecting compensation movements during all the reaching tasks. In detail, an excellent performance was achieved in discriminating between compensation and noncompensation (NC) movements, with an average F1-score of 0.993. For the multiclass classification of compensatory movement patterns, an average F1-score of 0.981 was achieved in recognizing the NC, trunk lean-forward (TLF), trunk rotation (TR) and shoulder elevation (SE) movements.
conclusionsGood classification performance in detecting and categorizing compensatory movements validated the feasibility of the proposed pressure distribution-based system. Reliable classification accuracy achieved by the machine learning algorithms indicated the potential to monitor compensation movements automatically by using the pressure distribution-based system when stroke survivors perform seated reaching tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.