Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31684951›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Economic development and road traffic injuries and fatalities in Thailand: an application of spatial panel data analysis, 2012-2016.

Rapeepong Suphanchaimat, Vorasith Sornsrivichai, Supon Limwattananon, Panithee Thammawijaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A study of the impact of traffic investment on traffic fatalities in China, 2004 - 2020.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rapeepong SuphanchaimatDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand. rapeepong@ihpp.thaigov.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3664-9050
Vorasith SornsrivichaiHealth System Management Institute, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.
Supon LimwattananonInternational Health Policy Program (IHPP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Panithee ThammawijayaDivision of Innovation and Research, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1134345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoad traffic injuries (RTIs) have been one of the most critical public health problems in Thailand for decades. The objective of this study was to examine to what extent provincial economy was associated with RTIs, road traffic deaths and case fatality rate in Thailand.

methodsA secondary data analysis on time-series data was applied. The unit of analysis was a panel of 77 provinces during 2012-2016. Data were obtained from relevant public authorities, including the Ministry of Public Health. Descriptive statistics and econometric models, using negative binomial (NB) regression, negative binomial regression with random-effects (RE) model, and spatial Durbin model (SDM) were employed. The main predictor variable was gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and the outcome variables were incidence proportion of RTIs, traffic deaths and case fatality rate. The analysis was adjusted for key covariates.

resultsThe incidence proportion of RTIs rose from 449.0 to 524.9 cases per 100,000 population from 2012 till 2016, whereas the incidence of traffic fatalities fluctuated between 29.7 and 33.2 deaths per 100,000 population. Case fatality rate steadily stood at 0.06-0.07 deaths per victim. RTIs and traffic deaths appeared to be positively correlated with provincial economy in the NB regression and the RE model. In the SDM, a log-Baht increase in GDP per capita (equivalent to a growth of GDP per capita by about 2.7 times) enlarged the incidence proportion of injuries and deaths by about a quarter (23.8-30.7%) with statistical significance. No statistical significance was found in case fatality rate by the SDM. The SDM also presented the best model fitness relative to other models.

conclusionThe incidence proportion of traffic injuries and deaths appeared to rise alongside provincial prosperity. This means that RTIs-preventive measures should be more intensified in economically well-off areas. Furthermore, entrepreneurs and business sectors that gain economic benefit in a particular province should share responsibility in RTIs prevention in the area where their businesses are running. Further studies that explore others determinants of road safety, such as patterns of vehicles used, attitudes and knowledge of motorists, investment in safety measures, and compliance with traffic laws, are recommended.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAdolescentAdultData AnalysisEconomic DevelopmentFemaleGross Domestic ProductHumansIncidenceMaleModels, EconometricSpatial AnalysisThailandWounds and InjuriesYoung AdultCase fatality rateGross domestic productNegative binomial regressionRandom effectsSpatial dataTraffic accidentTraffic deathTraffic fatalityTraffic injury

Identifiers

PMID31684951
PMCPMC6829991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.