Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31684936›Full record

SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2019

Ulinastatin treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Xiangyun Zhang, Zhaozhong Zhu, Weijie Jiao, Wei Liu, Fang Liu, Xi Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Exploring NFJournal of public health in Africa · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Effect of Urinary Trypsin Inhibitor (Ulinastatin) Therapy in COVID-19.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiangyun ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
Zhaozhong ZhuDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Weijie JiaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Henan Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Beijing, 100191, China.
Fang LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Beijing, 100191, China. liufang8-111@163.com.
Xi ZhuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Beijing, 100191, China. xizhuccm@163.com.
Peking University Third Hospital · CNHarvard University · USPeking University · CN

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7162199National Natural Science Foundation of China 81372043National Science and Technology Major Project 2018ZX10101004TECHPOOL Research Fund 01201113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemiologic studies have shown inconsistent conclusions about the effect of ulinastain treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). It is necessary to perform a meta-analysis of ulinastatin's randomized controlled trials (RCTS) to evaluate its efficacy for treating ARDS.

methodsWe searched the published RCTs of ulinastatin treatment for ARDS from nine databases (the latest search on April 30th, 2017). Two authors independently screened citations and extracted data. The meta-analysis was performed using Rev. Man 5.3 software.

resultsA total of 33 RCTs involving 2344 patients satisfied the selection criteria and were included in meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that, compared to conventional therapy, ulinastatin has a significant benefit for ARDS patients by reducing mortality (RR = 0.51, 95% CI:0.43~0.61) and ventilator associated pneumonia rate (RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.36~0.69), and shortening duration of mechanical ventilation (SMD = -1.29, 95% CI: -1.76~-0.83), length of intensive care unit stay (SMD = -1.38, 95% CI: -1.95~-0.80), and hospital stay (SMD = -1.70, 95% CI:-2.63~-0.77). Meanwhile, ulinastatin significantly increased the patients' oxygenation index (SMD = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.62~2.46) and decreased respiratory rate (SMD = -1.08, 95% CI: -1.29~-0.88) and serum inflammatory factors (tumor necrosis factor-α: SMD = -3.06, 95% CI:-4.34~-1.78; interleukin-1β: SMD = -3.49, 95% CI: -4.64~-2.34; interleukin-6: SMD = -2.39, 95% CI: -3.34~-1.45; interleukin-8: SMD = -2.43, 95% CI: -3.86~-1.00).

conclusionsUlinastatin seemly showed a beneficial effect for ARDS patients treatment and larger sample sized RCTs are needed to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

GlycoproteinsHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeTreatment OutcomeGlycoproteinsurinastatinARDSEfficacyMeta-analysisRCTsUlinastatin

Identifiers

PMID31684936
PMCPMC6829844
OpenAlexW2985156978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.