Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31684933›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Predictors of family focused practice: organisation, profession, or the role as child responsible personnel?

Bjørg Eva Skogøy, Terje Ogden, Bente Weimand, Torleif Ruud, Knut Sørgaard, Darryl Maybery

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A phenomenological investigation of kinship involvement in the lives of children whose parents have mental illness.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Bjørg Eva SkogøyNordland Hospital Trust, Kløveråsveien 1, 8076, Bodø, Norway. Bjorg.eva.skogoy@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9025-1449
Terje OgdenNorwegian Center for Child Behavioral Development, Unirand, Box 7053, Majorstuen, 0368, Oslo, Norway.
Bente WeimandDepartment for Research and Development, Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Box 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Torleif RuudDepartment for Research and Development, Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Box 1000, 1478, Lørenskog, Norway.
Knut SørgaardNordland Hospital Trust, Kløveråsveien 1, 8076, Bodø, Norway.
Darryl MayberyMonash University Department of Rural Health, Box 973, Moe, Victoria, 3825, Australia.
Nordland Hospital Trust · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOMonash University · AUOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NO

Funding

The Research Council of Norway ID:213477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth professionals in Norway are required by law to help safeguard information and follow-up with children of parents with mental or physical illness, or who have substance abuse problems, to reduce their higher risk of psychosocial problems. Knowledge is lacking regarding whether organisation and/or worker-related factors can explain the differences in health professionals' ability to support the families when patients are parents.

methodsEmploying a translated, generic version of the Family Focused Mental Health Practice Questionnaire (FFPQ), this cross-sectional study examines family focused practice (FFP) differences in relation to health professionals' background and role (N = 280) along with exploring predictors of parent, child, and family support.

resultsWhile most health professions had begun to have conversations with parents on children's needs, under one-third have had conversations with children. There were significant differences between nurses, social workers, psychologists, physicians, and others on seven of the FFP subscales, with physicians scoring lowest on five subscales and psychologists providing the least family support. Controlling for confounders, there were significant differences between child responsible personnel (CRP) and other clinicians (C), with CRP scoring significantly higher on knowledge and skills, confidence, and referrals. Predictors of FFP varied between less complex practices (talking with parents) and more complex practices (family support and referrals).

conclusionThe type of profession was a key predictor of delivering family support, suggesting that social workers have more undergraduate training to support families, followed by nurses; alternately, the results could suggest that that social workers and nurses have been more willing or able than physicians and psychologists to follow the new legal requirements. The findings highlight the importance of multidisciplinary teams and of tailoring training strategies to health professionals' needs in order to strengthen their ability to better support children and families when a parent is ill.

Indexed as

Child of Impaired ParentsMental DisordersProfessional RoleAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFamily PracticeFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayChildren as next of kinChildren of ill parentsChild responsible personnelFamily focused practiceLegislationParental illnessPolicy changesProfessional differences

Identifiers

PMID31684933
PMCPMC6829823
OpenAlexW2982727435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.