Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31684932›Full record

ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2019

Participatory learning and action to address type 2 diabetes in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative process evaluation.

Joanna Morrison, Kohenour Akter, Hannah Maria Jennings, Tasmin Nahar, Abdul Kuddus, Sanjit Kumer Shaha, Naveed Ahmed, Carina King, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, Anthony Costello and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joanna MorrisonUniversity College London Institute for Global Health, London, UK. Joanna.morrison@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9241-8863
Kohenour AkterDiabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Hannah Maria JenningsUniversity College London Institute for Global Health, London, UK.
Tasmin NaharDiabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abdul KuddusDiabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sanjit Kumer ShahaDiabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Naveed AhmedDiabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Carina KingUniversity College London Institute for Global Health, London, UK.
Hassan Haghparast-BidgoliUniversity College London Institute for Global Health, London, UK.
Anthony CostelloUniversity College London Institute for Global Health, London, UK.
A K Azad KhanDiabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kishwar AzadDiabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Edward FottrellUniversity College London Institute for Global Health, London, UK.
University College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M016501/1Medical Research Council (GB) MR/M016501/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes is 7th largest cause of death worldwide, and prevalence is increasing rapidly in low-and middle-income countries. There is an urgent need to develop and test interventions to prevent and control diabetes and develop the theory about how such interventions can be effective. We conducted a participatory learning and action (PLA) intervention with community groups in rural Bangladesh which was evaluated through a cluster randomised controlled trial. There was a large reduction in the combined prevalence of type 2 diabetes and intermediate hyperglycaemia in the PLA group compared with the control group. We present findings from qualitative process evaluation research to explore how this intervention was effective.

methodsWe conducted group interviews and focus group discussions using photovoice with purposively sampled group attenders and non-attenders, and intervention implementers. Data were collected before the trial analysis. We used inductive content analysis to generate theory from the data.

resultsThe intervention increased the health literacy of individuals and communities - developing their knowledge, capacity and self-confidence to enact healthy behaviours. Community, household and individual capacity increased through social support and social networks, which then created an enabling community context, further strengthening agency and enabling community action. This increased opportunities for healthy behaviour. Community actions addressed lack of awareness about diabetes, gendered barriers to physical activity and lack of access to blood glucose testing. The interaction between the individual, household, and community contexts amplified change, and yet there was limited engagement with macro level, or 'state', barriers to healthy behaviour.

conclusionsThe participatory approach enabled groups to analyse how context affected their ability to have healthy behaviours and participants engaged with issues as a community in the ways that they felt comfortable. We suggest measuring health literacy and social networks in future interventions and recommend specific capacity strengthening to develop public accountability mechanisms and health systems strengthening to complement community-based interventions.

trial registrationRegistered at ISRCTN on 30th March 2016 (Retrospectively Registered) Registration number: ISRCTN41083256 .

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchExerciseHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Education as TopicAgedBangladeshDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth BehaviorHumansMalePrognosisQualitative ResearchResearch DesignRetrospective StudiesBehaviour changeDiabetesNon-communicable diseaseProcess evaluationQualitativeRandomised controlled trialTheory of change

Identifiers

PMID31684932
PMCPMC6830002
OpenAlexW2987438141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.