Evaluating satellite estimates of particulate backscatter in the global open ocean using autonomous profiling floats.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Real-time quality control of optical backscattering data from Biogeochemical-Argo floats.Open research Europe · 2022
   Article
2. Seasonal bias in global ocean color observations.Applied optics · 2021
   Article
3. Particulate Backscattering in the Global Ocean: A Comparison of Independent Assessments.Geophysical research letters · 2021
   Article
4. Development of a bio-optical model for the Barents Sea to quantitatively link glider and satellite observations.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract