ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
A Comprehensive Review of Microfluidic Water Quality Monitoring Sensors.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.
- Polymer Optofluidic Chip for Double-Beam Photometric Determination of Nitrite in Water Samples.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Nanomaterial Enhanced PVDF Mixed Matrix Membranes for Microfluidic Electrochemical Desalination.Membranes · 2026Article
- Materials challenges in solid-state sensors for continuous monitoring of ions in water.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2026Review
- Remote Sensing Techniques for Water Quality Monitoring: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Gendered farmer perceptions towards soil nutrition and willingness to pay for a cafetière-style filter system forHeliyon · 2024Article
- Recent advances in portable devices for environmental monitoring applications.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Review
- Water quality prediction based on sparse dataset using enhanced machine learning.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2024Article
- Recent Trends in Chemical Sensors for Detecting Toxic Materials.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Electrochemical and Optical Sensors for Real-Time Detection of Nitrate in Water.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Polymeric and Paper-Based Lab-on-a-Chip Devices in Food Safety: A Review.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Urinary Biomarkers and Point-of-Care Urinalysis Devices for Early Diagnosis and Management of Disease: A Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- A device-independent method for the colorimetric quantification on microfluidic sensors using a color adaptation algorithm.Mikrochimica acta · 2023Article
- Light Harvesting Nanoprobe for Trace Detection of HgMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Microbiological quality of water samples obtained from water sources in Ishaka, Uganda.SAGE open medicine · 2023Article
- Sensors and Instruments for Brix Measurement: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Study on the mechanism of cadmium chloride pollution accelerating skin tissue metabolism disorder, aging and inhibiting hair regeneration.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Electrical and Electrochemical Sensors Based on Carbon Nanotubes for the Monitoring of Chemicals in Water-A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Manufacturing of Microfluidic Devices with Interchangeable Commercial Fiber Optic Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Microfluidic Systems for Cancer Diagnosis and Applications.Micromachines · 2021Review
- BoSL FAL pump: A small, low-cost, easily constructed, 3D-printed peristaltic pump for sampling of waters.HardwareX · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water crisis is a global issue due to water contamination and extremely restricted sources of fresh water. Water contamination induces severe diseases which put human lives at risk. Hence, water quality monitoring has become a prime activity worldwide. The available monitoring procedures are inadequate as most of them require expensive instrumentation, longer processing time, tedious processes, and skilled lab technicians. Therefore, a portable, sensitive, and selective sensor with in situ and continuous water quality monitoring is the current necessity. In this context, microfluidics is the promising technology to fulfill this need due to its advantages such as faster reaction times, better process control, reduced waste generation, system compactness and parallelization, reduced cost, and disposability. This paper presents a review on the latest enhancements of microfluidic-based electrochemical and optical sensors for water quality monitoring and discusses the relative merits and shortcomings of the methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.