Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31684057›Full record

ArticleCancers2019

Quantitative, Multi-institutional Evaluation of MR Thermometry Accuracy for Deep-Pelvic MR-Hyperthermia Systems Operating in Multi-vendor MR-systems Using a New Anthropomorphic Phantom.

Sergio Curto, Bassim Aklan, Tim Mulder, Oliver Mils, Manfred Schmidt, Ulf Lamprecht, Michael Peller, Ruediger Wessalowski, Lars H Lindner, Rainer Fietkau and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sergio CurtoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. s.curto@erasmusmc.nl.
Bassim AklanDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Ludwig-Maximilians University Hospital, 81377 Munich, Germany. bassim.aklan@googlemail.com.
Tim MulderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. h.t.mulder@erasmusmc.nl.
Oliver MilsDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. mils@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Manfred SchmidtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany. manfred.schmidt@uk-erlangen.de.
Ulf LamprechtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. ulf.lamprecht@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Michael PellerDepartment of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Hospital, 81377 Munich, Germany. s.curto@erasmusmc.nl.
Ruediger WessalowskiDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. wessalowski@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Lars H LindnerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Ludwig-Maximilians University Hospital, 81377 Munich, Germany. lars.lindner@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Rainer FietkauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany. rainer.fietkau@uk-erlangen.de.
Daniel ZipsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. daniel.zips@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Gennaro G BellizziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. g.bellizzi@erasmusmc.nl.
Netteke van HoltheDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. tenvijver@xs4all.nl.
Martine FranckenaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.franckena@erasmusmc.nl.
Margarethus M PaulidesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.m.paulides@tue.nl.
Gerard C van RhoonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. g.c.vanrhoon@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DE

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding KWF-DDHK 2013-6072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical outcome of hyperthermia depends on the achieved target temperature, therefore target conformal heating is essential. Currently, invasive temperature probe measurements are the gold standard for temperature monitoring, however, they only provide limited sparse data. In contrast, magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) provides unique capabilities to non-invasively measure the 3D-temperature. This study investigates MRT accuracy for MR-hyperthermia hybrid systems located at five European institutions while heating a centric or eccentric target in anthropomorphic phantoms with pelvic and spine structures. Scatter plots, root mean square error (RMSE) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to quantify accuracy of MRT compared to high resistance thermistor probe measurements. For all institutions, a linear relation between MRT and thermistor probes measurements was found with

Indexed as

anthropomorphic phantommagnetic resonance imaging-guided hyperthermiamagnetic resonance thermometryquality assuranceradiofrequency hyperthermiathermistor probe

Identifiers

PMID31684057
PMCPMC6896203
OpenAlexW2983187343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.