ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019
Back to Basics: Recognition of Sepsis with New Definition.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07030114 (Impact of Mechanical Ventilation on Hematological Parameters in Pediatric Patients With Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Mechanical Ventilation on Hematological Parameters in Pediatric Patients With Sepsis
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mining and analysis of drug-induced shock adverse reactions: A comprehensive pharmacovigilance study based on the US FAERS database.PloS one · 2025Article
- Attributable mortality of ARDS among critically ill patients with sepsis: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical value of TAT, PIC and t-PAIC as predictive markers for severe sepsis in pediatric patients.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Bacteremia in Patients with Sepsis in the ICU: Does It Make a Difference?Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Role of international normalized ratio in nonpulmonary sepsis screening: An observational study.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Failure of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Pneumonia and Non-Pneumonia Sepsis Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Survival prediction of patients with sepsis from age, sex, and septic episode number alone.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Defective Neutrophil Function in Patients with Sepsis Is Mostly Restored by ex vivo Ascorbate Incubation.Journal of inflammation research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with serious infections at risk of deterioration represent highly challenging clinical situations, and in particular for junior doctors. A comprehensive clinical examination that integrates the assessment of vital signs, hemodynamics, and peripheral perfusion into clinical decision making is key to responding promptly and effectively to evolving acute medical illnesses, such as sepsis or septic shock. Against this background, the new concept of sepsis definition may provide a useful link between junior doctors and consultant decision making. The purpose of this article is to introduce the updated definition of sepsis and suggest its practical implications, with particular emphasis on integrative clinical assessment, allowing for the rapid identification of patients who are at risk of further deterioration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.