Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31683867›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

ER-Negative Breast Cancer Is Highly Responsive to Cholesterol Metabolite Signalling.

Samantha A Hutchinson, Priscilia Lianto, Hanne Roberg-Larsen, Sebastiano Battaglia, Thomas A Hughes, James L Thorne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cholesterol, Oxysterols and LXRs in Breast Cancer Pathophysiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Samantha A HutchinsonSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. fssah@leeds.ac.uk.
Priscilia LiantoSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. fspl@leeds.ac.uk.
Hanne Roberg-LarsenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway. hanne.roberg-larsen@kjemi.uio.no.
Sebastiano BattagliaCenter for Immunotherapy, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, 14263 NY, USA. Sebastiano.Battaglia@RoswellPark.org.
Thomas A HughesSchool of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK. t.hughes@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1169-3386
James L ThorneSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. j.l.thorne@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3037-8528
University of Leeds · GBRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Breast Cancer Action Group 3T57/9R17-02Breast Cancer UK 1605381 and 1803609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventions that alter cholesterol have differential impacts on hormone receptor positive- and negative-breast cancer risk and prognosis. This implies differential regulation or response to cholesterol within different breast cancer subtypes. We evaluated differences in side-chain hydroxycholesterol and liver X nuclear receptor signalling between Oestrogen Receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancers and cell lines. Cell line models of ER-positive and ER-negative disease were treated with Liver X Receptor (LXR) ligands and transcriptional activity assessed using luciferase reporters, qPCR and MTT. Publicly available datasets were mined to identify differences between ER-negative and ER-positive tumours and siRNA was used to suppress candidate regulators. Compared to ER-positive breast cancer, ER-negative breast cancer cells were highly responsive to LXR agonists. In primary disease and cell lines LXRA expression was strongly correlated with its target genes in ER-negative but not ER-positive disease. Expression of LXR's corepressors (NCOR1, NCOR2 and LCOR) was significantly higher in ER-positive disease relative to ER-negative, and their knock-down equalized sensitivity to ligand between subtypes in reporter, gene expression and viability assays. Our data support further evaluation of dietary and pharmacological targeting of cholesterol metabolism as an adjunct to existing therapies for ER-negative and ER-positive breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCholesterolFemaleHumansLiver X ReceptorsNuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 1Nuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 2PrognosisReceptors, EstrogenRepressor ProteinsRNA, Small InterferingSignal TransductionTranscription, GeneticCholesterolLCOR protein, humanLiver X ReceptorsNCOR1 protein, humanNCOR2 protein, humanNuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 1Nuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 2Receptors, EstrogenRepressor ProteinsRNA, Small Interferingbreast cancercholesterolcorepressorshydroxycholesterolLXRoestrogen receptor status

Identifiers

PMID31683867
PMCPMC6893441
OpenAlexW2987649810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.