Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31683783›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Dental Unit Waterlines: A Survey of Practices in Eastern France.

Alexandre Baudet, Julie Lizon, Jean-Marc Martrette, Frédéric Camelot, Arnaud Florentin, Céline Clément

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Initial waterline contamination byMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Efficacy of BRSInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre BaudetFaculty of Dentistry, University of Lorraine, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. alexandre.baudet@univ-lorraine.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-2905-0530
Julie LizonDepartment of Hygiene and Environmental Analysis, University Hospital, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. j.lizon@chru-nancy.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-8831-5629
Jean-Marc MartretteFaculty of Dentistry, University of Lorraine, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. jean-marc.martrette@univ-lorraine.fr.
Frédéric CamelotDental Private Practice, 88300 Neufchateau, France. frederic.camelot@wanadoo.fr.
Arnaud FlorentinDepartment of Hygiene and Environmental Analysis, University Hospital, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. arnaud.florentin@univ-lorraine.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-2011-4016
Céline ClémentFaculty of Dentistry, University of Lorraine, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. celine.clement@univ-lorraine.fr.
Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRInterdisciplinarité en Santé Publique Interventions et Instruments de mesure complexes – Région Est · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water is essential during dental care. Physical and chemical techniques should be used to maintain a good water quality with respect to bacteria, and to ensure the safety of exposed patients and dental staff. The aim of this survey was to assess the modalities used by dental practitioners in Eastern France to maintain the water quality of their dental unit waterlines (DUWLs). A questionnaire about water quality maintenance practices was sent to 870 dental offices in 2016. The questionnaires were completed by 153 dental offices, covering about 223 dental care units. The majority of units were fed by mains water (91.0%), which is generally unfiltered (71.3%). One-third (33.6%) of the units had an independent water bottle reservoir. Flushing, a basic physical technique to improve the quality of units' outflow water, was practiced in 65.4% of dental offices. Concerning the chemical treatment of water, it was used for 62.1% of the units. An analysis of the microbiological quality of the DUWL water was only carried out in 2.6% of the offices. In conclusion, providing better training to dental staff seems necessary to improve their practices and to generalize procedures that improve the microbiological quality of the water used.

Indexed as

BiofilmsColony Count, MicrobialDental DisinfectantsWater MicrobiologyDental EquipmentEquipment ContaminationFranceHumansInfection Control, DentalSurveys and QuestionnairesDental Disinfectantsdental chairinfectious controloccupational practiceswaterlineswater quality

Identifiers

PMID31683783
PMCPMC6862618
OpenAlexW2984086239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.