Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31683624›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Mutagenesis Approaches and Their Role in Crop Improvement.

Juhi Chaudhary, Rupesh Deshmukh, Humira Sonah

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CRISPR-Based Editing of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A collection of novelFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Biotechnological Advances to Improve Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Juhi ChaudharyDepartment of Biology, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074, USA. juhi.chaudhary@gmail.com.
Rupesh DeshmukhNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute (NABI), Sector 80, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Punjab 140306, India. rupesh0deshmukh@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4167-6552
Humira SonahNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute (NABI), Sector 80, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Punjab 140306, India. biohuma@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4796-6120
National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute · INOberlin College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induced mutagenesis is one of the most efficient tools that has been utilized extensively to create genetic variation as well as for identification of key regulatory genes for economically important traits toward the crop improvement. Mutations can be induced by several techniques such as physical, chemical, and insertional mutagen treatments; however, these methods are not preferred because of cost and tedious process. Nonetheless, with the advancements in next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, millions of mutations can be detected in a very short period of time and, therefore, considered as convenient and cost efficient. Furthermore, induced mutagenesis coupled with whole-genome sequencing has provided a robust platform for forward and reverse genetic applications. Moreover, the availability of whole-genome sequence information for large number of crops has enabled target-specific genome editing techniques as a preferable method to engineer desired mutations. The available genome editing approaches such as ZFNs (Zinc Finger Nucleases), transcription activator like effector nucleases (TALENS), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated9 (Cas9) endonuclease have been utilized to perform site-specific mutations in several plant species. In particular, the CRISPR/Cas9 has transformed the genome editing because of its simplicity and robustness, therefore, have been utilized to enhance biotic and abiotic stress resistance. The Special Issue of

Indexed as

CRISPRgenome editingmutagenesismutation sequencingnext-generation sequencing (NGS)proteomics

Identifiers

PMID31683624
PMCPMC6918138
OpenAlexW2982389025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.