ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019
In Vitro Simulation and In Vivo Assessment of Tooth Wear: A Meta-Analysis of In Vitro and Clinical Research.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Presence of SARS-CoV-2 and Its Entry Factors in Oral Tissues and Cells: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of three-body wear on the surface properties of different polymer-based CAD/CAM dental restorative and prosthetic materials.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of Simulated Oral Aging on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Effects of Yttria Content and Margin Design on the Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Assessing Enamel Wear of Monolithic Ceramics With Micro-CT and Intra-oral Scanner.International dental journal · 2023Article
- Effect of the Abutment Rigidity on the Wear Resistance of a Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic: An In Vitro Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- AFM Analysis of a Three-Point Flexure Tested, 3D Printing Definitive Restoration Material for Dentistry.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Effect of Different Mixing Methods on Physicochemical Properties of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: A Systematic Review.International journal of dentistry · 2023Review
- Wear Properties of Conventional and High-Translucent Zirconia-Based Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Wear of Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Network Materials against Enamel.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Wear Behavior and Surface Quality of Dental Bioactive Ions-Releasing Resins Under Simulated Chewing Conditions.Frontiers in oral health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tooth wear may be described as a side-effect of occlusal forces that may be further induced by the common use of contemporary prosthetic materials in practice. The purpose of this systematic review was to appraise existing evidence on enamel wear from both in vitro and clinical research and explore whether evidence from these study designs lies on the same direction. Five databases of published and unpublished research were searched without limitations in August 2019 and study selection criteria included in vitro and clinical research on enamel tooth wear. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were done independently and in duplicate. Random effects meta-analyses of standardized mean differences (SMDs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were conducted while a Monte Carlo permutation test for meta-regression on the exploration of the effect of the study design on the reported outcomes was planned. A total of 27 studies (23 in vitro and 4 clinical) were eligible while 12 contributed to meta-analyses. Overall, some concerns were raised for the quality of the existing evidence and the potential for risk of bias. Enamel wear (mm) of antagonist teeth was more pronounced when opposed to conventional porcelain compared to machinable ceramics (SMD = 2.18; 95%CIs: 1.34, 3.02;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.