Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31683532›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

A Novel Method for Classification of Running Fatigue Using Change-Point Segmentation.

Taha Khan, Lina E Lundgren, Eric Järpe, M Charlotte Olsson, Pelle Viberg

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. [Research on muscle fatigue recognition model based on improved wavelet denoising and long short-term memory].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taha KhanCentre of Artificial Intelligence, School of information technology, Halmstad University, SE-301 18 Halmstad, Sweden. taha.khan@hh.se.ORCID 0000-0003-0878-8130
Lina E LundgrenCentre of Artificial Intelligence, School of information technology, Halmstad University, SE-301 18 Halmstad, Sweden. Lina.Lundgren@hh.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2513-3040
Eric JärpeCentre of Artificial Intelligence, School of information technology, Halmstad University, SE-301 18 Halmstad, Sweden. eric.jarpe@hh.se.
M Charlotte OlssonRydberg Laboratory of Applied Science, School of business, engineering and science, Halmstad University, SE-301 18 Halmstad, Sweden. charlotte.olsson@hh.se.
Pelle VibergRaytelligence AB, 302 42 Halmstad, Sweden. pelle@swedishadrenaline.com.
Halmstad University · SESwedish Adrenaline (Sweden) · SE

Funding

Stiftelsen för Kunskaps- och Kompetensutveckling CAISR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood lactate accumulation is a crucial fatigue indicator during sports training. Previous studies have predicted cycling fatigue using surface-electromyography (sEMG) to non-invasively estimate lactate concentration in blood. This study used sEMG to predict muscle fatigue while running and proposes a novel method for the automatic classification of running fatigue based on sEMG. Data were acquired from 12 runners during an incremental treadmill running-test using sEMG sensors placed on the vastus-lateralis, vastus-medialis, biceps-femoris, semitendinosus, and gastrocnemius muscles of the right and left legs. Blood lactate samples of each runner were collected every two minutes during the test. A change-point segmentation algorithm labeled each sample with a class of fatigue level as (1) aerobic, (2) anaerobic, or (3) recovery. Three separate random forest models were trained to classify fatigue using 36 frequency, 51 time-domain, and 36 time-event sEMG features. The models were optimized using a forward sequential feature elimination algorithm. Results showed that the random forest trained using distributive power frequency of the sEMG signal of the vastus-lateralis muscle alone could classify fatigue with high accuracy. Importantly for this feature, group-mean ranks were significantly different (

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultArea Under CurveBicyclingElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMuscle FatigueReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveRunningblood lactate concentrationfatiguerandom forestrunningsurface-electromyography

Identifiers

PMID31683532
PMCPMC6864433
OpenAlexW2982600499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.