Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31683516›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Systematic Development of Materials for Inviting Low Health-Literate Individuals to Participate in Preconception Counseling.

Laxsini Murugesu, Miriam E Hopman, Sabine F Van Voorst, Ageeth N Rosman, Mirjam P Fransen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preconception Care in a Remote Aboriginal Community Context: What, When and by Whom?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laxsini MurugesuAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Public Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. l.murugesu@amsterdamumc.nl.
Miriam E HopmanAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Public Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.e.hopman@amsterdamumc.nl.
Sabine F Van VoorstDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. s.vanvoorst@erasmusmc.nl.
Ageeth N RosmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.n.rosman@hr.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3751-2950
Mirjam P FransenAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Public Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.p.fransen@amsterdamumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we aimed to systematically analyze problems in the recruitment of women with low health literacy for preconception counseling and to adapt and evaluate written invitations for this group. In a problem analysis (stage 1) we used structured interviews (n = 72) to assess comprehension of the initial invitations, perception of perinatal risks, attitude and intention to participate in preconception counseling. These outcomes were used to adapt the invitation. The adapted flyer was pretested in interviews (n = 16) (stage 2) and evaluated in structured interviews among a new group of women (n = 67) (stage 3). Differences between women in stages 1 and 3 regarding comprehension, risk perception, attitude and intention to participate in counseling were analyzed by linear regression analysis and chi-square tests. Women in stage 3 (who read the adapted flyer) had a more positive attitude towards participation in preconception counselling and a better understanding of how to apply for a consultation than women in stage 1 (who read the initial invitations). No differences were found in intention to participate in preconception counseling and risk perception. Systematic adaptation of written invitations can improve the recruitment of low health-literate women for preconception counselling. Further research should gain insight into additional strategies to reach and inform this group.

Indexed as

CounselingHealth LiteracyPreconception CareWomen's HealthAdultFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansIntentionPregnancyhealth literacypreconception counselingrecruitmentwritten invitation

Identifiers

PMID31683516
PMCPMC6862136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.