Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31683111›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2019

The internationalization of human microbiome research.

Ana Maria Porras, Ilana Lauren Brito

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Feasibility of an At-Home Adult Stool Specimen Collection Method in Rural Cambodia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microbial Journey: Mount Everest to Mars.Indian journal of microbiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ana Maria PorrasMeinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, United States.
Ilana Lauren BritoMeinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14850, United States. Electronic address: ibrito@cornell.edu.

Funding

Genetic Transmission of Components of the Human Gut MicrobiomeR01DK093595 · NIDDK · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI CLARK, ANDREW G, LEY, RUTH EMILY · 2011 to 2020
$3.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK093595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human microbiome has now been linked with myriad diseases, yet most of this research has been conducted on American and European populations that make up only 1/6th of the world's population. With growing recognition that human microbiomes differ tremendously across global populations, it is especially important to understand how these compositional differences impact health outcomes. Recent advances in infectious disease and malnutrition research have demonstrated the potential for microbiome-based strategies to address the biggest challenges in global health. This review highlights major advances toward understanding microbiome diversity across the world and its contributions to disease, and outlines key questions, challenges, and opportunities to broaden the scope of and promote inclusivity within microbiome research.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeGlobal HealthResearchDiseaseGenetic VariationHost Microbial InteractionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID31683111
PMCPMC6907006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.