Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31683020›Full record

SynthesisThe journal of pain

A Comparative Meta-Analysis of Unidisciplinary Psychology and Interdisciplinary Treatment Outcomes Following Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Adults with Chronic Pain.

Kevin E Vowles, Melissa Pielech, Karlyn A Edwards, Mindy L McEntee, Robert W Bailey

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journal of pain. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kevin E VowlesSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK. Electronic address: k.vowles@qub.ac.uk.
Melissa PielechCenter for Alcohol and Addictions Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Karlyn A EdwardsDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Mindy L McEnteeCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Robert W BaileySwedish Pain Services, Swedish Health System, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Family-Based Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in Adolescents and Young AdultsF32DA049440 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI PIELECH, MELISSA · 2019 to 2020
$134k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA049440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While much of the literature provides positive support for psychological interventions for chronic pain, 2 recent meta-analyses indicate small to moderate benefits only. This inconsistency in findings suggests that there are other treatment-related variables to consider. One possible consideration pertains to treatment format, as psychological models form the basis for both unidisciplinary psychology and integrated interdisciplinary treatments for chronic pain. Therefore, a comparative meta-analysis of unidisciplinary and interdisciplinary treatments was performed to determine whether there were differences in treatment effect size (ES) at post-treatment and follow-ups of up to 1 year. One specific treatment model, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), was investigated as it was felt that this literature was extensive enough to perform the planned analysis, while also being circumscribed enough in size to make it feasible. In total, 29 articles met inclusion criteria, 13 reported outcomes for unidisciplinary ACT, and 15 for interdisciplinary ACT. At both post-treatment and follow-up, interdisciplinary ACT had a greater ES for physical disability, psychosocial impact, and depression compared to unidisciplinary ACT. No differences in ES were observed for pain intensity, pain-related anxiety, or pain acceptance. Findings remained the same when study heterogeneity was considered. There was a significant difference observed between treatment format and treatment duration-on average, unidisciplinary interventions were of shorter duration than interdisciplinary interventions. Moderation analyses examining the relation between total treatment duration and ES generally indicated a moderate positive relation between treatment length and ES. This relation was strong for psychosocial impact. PERSPECTIVE: A comparative meta-analysis examined the relative ES of unidisciplinary (ie, clinical psychology only) and interdisciplinary ACT for chronic pain in 29 studies. The ES for interdisciplinary ACT was larger than unidisciplinary ACT for physical disability, psychosocial impact, and depression. No differences were present for pain intensity, anxiety, and acceptance.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyOutcome Assessment, Health CareChronic PainHumansAcceptance and Commitment TherapyChronic paincomparative meta-analysisoutcomespsychology

Identifiers

PMID31683020
PMCPMC7477894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.