Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31682927›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2019

Different types of associative encoding evoke differential processing in both younger and older adults: Evidence from univariate and multivariate analyses.

Nancy A Dennis, Amy A Overman, Courtney R Gerver, Kayla E McGraw, M Andrew Rowley, Joanna M Salerno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Examining the neural basis of unitization: A review.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Understanding associative false memories in aging using multivariate analyses.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nancy A DennisThe Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. Electronic address: nad12@psu.edu.
Amy A OvermanThe Department of Psychology, Elon University, NC, USA.
Courtney R GerverThe Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Kayla E McGrawThe Department of Psychology, Elon University, NC, USA.
M Andrew RowleyThe Department of Psychology, Elon University, NC, USA.
Joanna M SalernoThe Department of Psychology, Elon University, NC, USA.

Funding

INVESTIGATING AGE-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE AND NEURAL REPRESENTATIONS IN ASSOCIATIVE MEMORYR15AG052903 · NIA · XAVIER UNIVERSITY · PI OVERMAN, AMY A · 2016 to 2020
$758k
NIA NIH HHS R15 AG052903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related deficits in associative processing are well-documented (e.g., Naveh-Benjamin, 2000) and have been assumed to be the result of a general deficit that affects all types of binding. However, recent behavioral research has indicated that the visual configuration of the information that is presented to older adults influences the degree to which this binding deficit is exhibited by older adults (Overman, Dennis et al, 2019; Overman, Dennis, et al., 2018). The purpose of the present study was to further clarify the neural underpinnings of the associative deficit in aging and to examine whether functional activity at encoding differs with respect to the visual configuration and the type of associative being encoded. Using both univariate and multi-voxel pattern analysis, we found differences in both the magnitude of activation and pattern of neural responses associated with the type of association encoded (item-item and item-context). Specifically, our results suggest that, when controlling for stimuli composition, patterns of activation in sensory and frontal regions within the associative encoding network are able to distinguish between different types of associations. With respect to the MTL, multivariate results suggest that only patterns of activation in the PrC in older, but not younger adults, can distinguish between associations types. These findings extend prior work regarding the neural basis of associative memory in young and older adults, and extends the predictions of the binding of item and context model (BIC; Diana, Yonelinas, Ranganath, 2007) to older adults.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAgingAnalysis of VarianceAssociation LearningBrainBrain MappingFemaleHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOccipital LobePrefrontal CortexYoung AdultAgingAssociative memoryfMRIMTLMVPA

Identifiers

PMID31682927
PMCPMC6951809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.