ArticleSeminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
Injectable Shear-Thinning Hydrogels Prevent Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation and Normalize Ventricular Flow Dynamics.
Article in Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large animal models of ischemic mitral regurgitation-systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Injectable hydrogels are known to attenuate left-ventricular (LV) remodeling following myocardial infarction (MI), dependent on material mechanical properties. The effect of hydrogel injection on ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) resultant from LV remodeling remains relatively unexplored. This study uses multiple imaging methods to evaluate the efficacy of injectable hydrogels with tunable modulus to prevent post-MI development of IMR. Posterolateral MI was induced in 20 sheep with subsequent epicardial injection of saline (control (MI); n = 7), soft hydrogel (guest-host crosslinking, modulus <1 kPa, n = 7), or stiff hydrogel (dual-crosslinking, modulus = 41.4 ± 4.3 kPa, n = 6) within the infarct region and 8-week follow-up. IMR and valve geometry were assessed by echocardiography. LV geometry (long-axis dimension, posterior chordae length) and ventricular flow dynamics were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. IMR developed in MI controls at 8 weeks and was attenuated with hydrogel treatment (IMR grade for MI: 1.86 ± 0.69; guest-host crosslinking: 1.29 ± 1.11; dual-crosslinking: 0.50 ± 0.55, P = 0.02 vs MI). Tethering of the posterior leaflet increased in MI controls, but not with stiff hydrogel treatment. Across cohorts, IMR was correlated with changes in the long-axis dimension (Spearman R = 0.77) and posterior chordae length (Spearman R = 0.64). Intraventricular flow dynamics were highly disturbed in MI controls, but stiff hydrogel treatment normalized flow patterns and reduced the prevalence of large (≥2+ MR, >5 mL) regurgitant volumes. Injectable hydrogels attenuated subvalvular remodeling and leaflet tethering, preventing IMR development and normalizing LV flow dynamics. Hydrogels with a supraphysiological modulus yielded best outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.