ReviewGastroenterology2020
Causes of Socioeconomic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer and Intervention Framework and Strategies.
Review in Gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 212 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
212 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 298 citations in OpenAlex.
- Area-level socioeconomic status is associated with colorectal cancer screening, incidence and mortality in the US: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2025Pooled it
- Quality measures in the delivery of equitable endoscopic care to traditionally underserved patients in the United States.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Guideline
- Disability and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Pooled it
- Racial disparities in colorectal cancer clinicopathological and molecular tumor characteristics: a systematic review.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Pooled it
- Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Adherence to Fecal Occult Blood Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2023Pooled it
- National and subnational incidence, mortality and associated factors of colorectal cancer in China: A systematic analysis and modelling study.Journal of global health · 2023Pooled it
- Area-Level Determinants in Colorectal Cancer Spatial Clustering Studies: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Mailed Outreach for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers: The CARES Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2026Trial
- The effect of educational intervention based on health belief model on colorectal cancer screening behaviors.BMC public health · 2024Trial
- Baseline Features and Reasons for Nonparticipation in the Colonoscopy Versus Fecal Immunochemical Test in Reducing Mortality From Colorectal Cancer (CONFIRM) Study, a Colorectal Cancer Screening Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Effects of culturally targeted message framing on colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021Trial
- A screening-threshold-oriented framework reveals threshold-adjacent redistribution of global colorectal cancer burden: an analysis of GBD 2023.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Exercise therapy in cancer prevention and treatment.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Colorectal Cancer Outcomes Among Disaggregated Asian Subgroups: a 2006-2020 SEER Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Observational
- Operationalizing Precision Medicine in Drug Development: Predictive Biomarkers, Companion Diagnostics, and Regulatory Pathways.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- A Qualitative Exploration of the Decision Not to Take Part in Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Women Living in Lower Socio-Economic Areas.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Identifying clinical and lifestyle factor mediators of the association between socioeconomic status and colorectal cancer mortality.SSM - population health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Guided Analysis of WNT Pathway Alterations: Associations with Genomic Burden and Survival Across African American and Non-Hispanic White Populations, Age Groups, and FOLFOX Treatment in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Monitoring of Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Among African American Patients of North Florida Community Health Centers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Insurance Co-Payment Status and Advanced-Stage Presentation of Colorectal Cancer in a Universal Healthcare System: A Surgical Cohort Study From Japan.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
152 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) disproportionately affects people from low socioeconomic backgrounds and some racial minorities. Disparities in CRC incidence and outcomes might result from differences in exposure to risk factors such as unhealthy diet and sedentary lifestyle; limited access to risk-reducing behaviors such as chemoprevention, screening, and follow-up of abnormal test results; or lack of access to high-quality treatment resources. These factors operate at the individual, provider, health system, community, and policy levels to perpetuate CRC disparities. However, CRC disparities can be eliminated. Addressing the complex factors that contribute to development and progression of CRC with multicomponent, adaptive interventions, at multiple levels of the care continuum, can reduce gaps in mortality. These might be addressed with a combination of health care and community-based interventions and policy changes that promote healthy behaviors and ensure access to high-quality and effective measures for CRC prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Improving resources and coordinating efforts in communities where people of low socioeconomic status live and work would increase access to evidence-based interventions. Research is also needed to understand the role and potential mechanisms by which factors in diet, intestinal microbiome, and/or inflammation contribute to differences in colorectal carcinogenesis. Studies of large cohorts with diverse populations are needed to identify epidemiologic and molecular factors that contribute to CRC development in different populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.