Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31682574›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2019

Wise Practices for Cultural Safety in Electronic Health Research and Clinical Trials With Indigenous People: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Marion A Maar, Valerie Beaudin, Karen Yeates, Lisa Boesch, Peter Liu, Kian Madjedi, Nancy Perkins, Diane Hua-Stewart, Faith Beaudin, Mary Jo Wabano and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02111226 (DREAM-GLOBAL), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02111226 naunknown statusnot on this map

DREAM-GLOBAL: Diagnosing hypeRtension - Engaging Action and Management in Getting LOwer Bp in Aboriginal and LMIC - A Research Proposal

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRan2012 to 2018Enrolled360ConditionsHypertension, Cardiovascular Disease, DiabetesArmsSMS text messaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. PPIE in intervention studies: Randomized trials and clinical quality improvement.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Marion A MaarFaculty of Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9901-1436
Valerie BeaudinM'Chigeeng Health Centre, M'Chigeeng First Nation, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0510-6459
Karen YeatesDepartment of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3628-0879
Lisa BoeschDepartment of Research, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2507-1206
Peter LiuUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3017-1199
Kian MadjediDepartment of Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6869-0680
Nancy PerkinsDepartment of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6140-4848
Diane Hua-StewartDepartment of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4421-1646
Faith BeaudinM'Chigeeng Health Centre, M'Chigeeng First Nation, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9380-1629
Mary Jo WabanoNaandwechige-Gamik Health Centre, Wiikwemkoong Unceded Territory, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5087-2972
Sheldon W TobeFaculty of Medicine, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7848-3872
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre · CANOSM University · CAFirst Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba · CALaurentian University · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a paucity of controlled clinical trial data based on research with Indigenous peoples. A lack of data specific to Indigenous peoples means that new therapeutic methods, such as those involving electronic health (eHealth), will be extrapolated to these groups based on research with other populations. Rigorous, ethical research can be undertaken in collaboration with Indigenous communities but requires careful attention to culturally safe research practices. Literature on how to involve Indigenous peoples in the development and evaluation of eHealth or mobile health apps that responds to the needs of Indigenous patients, providers, and communities is still scarce; however, the need for community-based participatory research to develop culturally safe technologies is emerging as an essential focus in Indigenous eHealth research. To be effective, researchers must first gain an in-depth understanding of Indigenous determinants of health, including the harmful consequences of colonialism. Second, researchers need to learn how colonialism affects the research process. The challenge then for eHealth researchers is to braid Indigenous ethical values with the requirements of good research methodologies into a culturally safe research protocol.

objectiveA recent systematic review showed that Indigenous peoples are underrepresented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), primarily due to a lack of attention to providing space for Indigenous perspectives within the study frameworks of RCTs. Given the lack of guidelines for conducting RCTs with Indigenous communities, we conducted an analysis of our large evaluation data set collected in the Diagnosing Hypertension-Engaging Action and Management in Getting Lower Blood Pressure in Indigenous Peoples and Low- and Middle- Income Countries (DREAM-GLOBAL) trial over a period of five years. Our goal is to identify wise practices for culturally safe, collaborative eHealth and RCT research with Indigenous communities.

methodsWe thematically analyzed survey responses and qualitative interview/focus group data that we collected over five years in six culturally diverse Indigenous communities in Canada during the evaluation of the clinical trial DREAM-GLOBAL. We established themes that reflect culturally safe approaches to research and then developed wise practices for culturally safe research in pragmatic eHealth research.

resultsBased on our analysis, successful eHealth research in collaboration with Indigenous communities requires a focus on cultural safety that includes: (1) building a respectful relationship; (2) maintaining a respectful relationship; (3) good communication and support for the local team during the RCT; (4) commitment to co-designing the innovation; (5) supporting task shifting with the local team; and (6) reflecting on our mistakes and lessons learned or areas for improvement that support learning and cultural safety.

conclusionsBased on evaluation data collected in the DREAM-GLOBAL RCT, we found that there are important cultural safety considerations in Indigenous eHealth research. Building on the perspectives of Indigenous staff and patients, we gleaned wise practices for RCTs in Indigenous communities.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02111226; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02111226.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsClinical Trials as TopicHumansIndigenous PeoplesPopulation Groupscommunity-based participatory researchDREAM-GLOBALhealth care textinghypertensionimplementation scienceIndigenous peoplesmobile healthprocess evaluationSMStask shifting

Identifiers

PMID31682574
PMCPMC6862000
OpenAlexW2975260229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.