ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2020
Performance Monitoring during Visual Priming.
Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two routes to a target: Visual priming for direct and indirect attentional sets.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Feedforward attentional selection in sensory cortex.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Inversion of pop-out for a distracting feature dimension in monkey visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Priming of probabilistic attentional templates.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Review
- Resolving the mesoscopic missing link: Biophysical modeling of EEG from cortical columns in primates.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022Review
- Article
- Pop-out search instigates beta-gated feature selectivity enhancement across V4 layers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Neural mechanism of priming in visual search.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Review
- Stimulus Feature-Specific Information Flow Along the Columnar Cortical Microcircuit Revealed by Multivariate Laminar Spiking Analysis.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repetitive performance of single-feature (efficient or pop-out) visual search improves RTs and accuracy. This phenomenon, known as priming of pop-out, has been demonstrated in both humans and macaque monkeys. We investigated the relationship between performance monitoring and priming of pop-out. Neuronal activity in the supplementary eye field (SEF) contributes to performance monitoring and to the generation of performance monitoring signals in the EEG. To determine whether priming depends on performance monitoring, we investigated spiking activity in SEF as well as the concurrent EEG of two monkeys performing a priming of pop-out task. We found that SEF spiking did not modulate with priming. Surprisingly, concurrent EEG did covary with priming. Together, these results suggest that performance monitoring contributes to priming of pop-out. However, this performance monitoring seems not mediated by SEF. This dissociation suggests that EEG indices of performance monitoring arise from multiple, functionally distinct neural generators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.