Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31682257›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2019

Association of Animal and Plant Protein Intake With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in a Japanese Cohort.

Sanjeev Budhathoki, Norie Sawada, Motoki Iwasaki, Taiki Yamaji, Atsushi Goto, Ayaka Kotemori, Junko Ishihara, Ribeka Takachi, Hadrien Charvat, Tetsuya Mizoue and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 107 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sanjeev BudhathokiEpidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Norie SawadaEpidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Motoki IwasakiEpidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Taiki YamajiEpidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi GotoEpidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayaka KotemoriEpidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Junko IshiharaDepartment of Food and Life Science, Azabu University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ribeka TakachiDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Human Life and Environment, Nara Women's University, Nara, Japan.
Hadrien CharvatEpidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuya MizoueDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyasu IsoPublic Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Shoichiro TsuganeEpidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Japan Public Health Center–based Prospective Study Group
Azabu University · JPNara Women's University · JPNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPOsaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Epidemiological evidence regarding the long-term effects of higher dietary protein intake on mortality outcomes in the general population is not clear. Objective: To evaluate the associations between animal and plant protein intake and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included 70 696 participants in the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Cohort who were aged 45 to 74 years and had no history of cancer, cerebrovascular disease, or ischemic heart disease at study baseline. Data were collected from January 1, 1995, through December 31, 1999, with follow-up completed December 31, 2016, during which 12 381 total deaths were documented. Dietary intake information was collected through a validated food frequency questionnaire and used to estimate protein intake in all participants. Participants were grouped into quintile categories based on their protein intake, expressed as a percentage of total energy. Data were analyzed from July 18, 2017, through April 10, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for all-cause and cause-specific mortality were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models with adjustment for potential confounding factors. Results: Among the 70 696 participants, 32 201 (45.5%) were men (mean [SD] age, 55.6 [7.6] years) and 38 495 (54.5%) were women (mean [SD] age, 55.8 [7.7] years). Intake of animal protein showed no clear association with total or cause-specific mortality. In contrast, intake of plant protein was associated with lower total mortality, with multivariable-adjusted HRs of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.95) for quintile 2; 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82-0.95) for quintile 3; 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.92) for quintile 4; and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.96) for quintile 5, with quintile 1 as the reference category (P = .01 for trend). For cause-specific mortality, this association with plant protein intake was evident for cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality (HRs, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.73-0.96] to 0.70 [95% CI, 0.59-0.83]; P = .002 for trend). Isocaloric substitution of 3% energy from plant protein for red meat protein was associated with lower total (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55-0.80), cancer-related (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45-0.82), and CVD-related (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86) mortality; substitution for processed meat protein was associated with lower total (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38-0.75) and cancer-related (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30-0.85) mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: In this large prospective study, higher plant protein intake was associated with lower total and CVD-related mortality. Although animal protein intake was not associated with mortality outcomes, replacement of red meat protein or processed meat protein with plant protein was associated with lower total, cancer-related, and CVD-related mortality.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorMeatPlant ProteinsAdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathDietFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31682257
PMCPMC6714005
OpenAlexW2970943766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.