ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2019
Legitimacy of work tasks, psychosocial work environment, and time utilization among primary care staff in Sweden.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- More Indirect Patient Care Activities per Visit: 11-Year Analysis of Family Physician Electronic Health Records in Canada.Annals of family medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of COVID-19 on illegitimate tasks across occupations in Sweden: a longitudinal observational study.BMC public health · 2026Observational
- No Band-Aids for papercuts: understanding and addressing challenges of administrative workload in primary care in Canada.Family practice · 2025Article
- Burden of administrative responsibilities in primary care: Qualitative study.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between Illegitimate Tasks and Nurse Work Engagement: The Mediating Role of Workplace Mindfulness.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
- Contextualising the job demands-resources model: a cross-sectional study of the psychosocial work environment across different healthcare professions.Human resources for health · 2024Article
- "Returning to the core tasks": a qualitative interview study about how general practitioners in home health care solved problems during the COVID-19 pandemic.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2024Article
- A Cross-Sectional Survey of Swedish Primary Healthcare Nurses' Discontent With Their Current Job.Journal of nursing management · 2024Article
- Do illegitimate tasks matter for registered nurses' work motivation? A cross-sectional study based on a nationally representative sample of Swedish nurses.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2023Article
- Psychometric properties of the Bern illegitimate tasks scale using classical test and item response theories.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- When Illegitimate Tasks Threaten Patient Safety Culture: A Cross-Sectional Survey in a Tertiary Hospital.International journal of public health · 2023Article
- Saving lives by asking questions: nurses' experiences of suicide risk assessment in telephone counselling in primary health care.Primary health care research & development · 2022Article
- 'But there are so many referrals which are totally … only generating work and irritation': a qualitative study of physicians' and nurses' experiences of work tasks in primary care in Sweden.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2022Article
- Working conditions in primary healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interview study with physicians in Sweden.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Working conditions in primary care: a qualitative interview study with physicians in Sweden informed by the Effort-Reward-Imbalance model.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Bern Illegitimate Tasks Scale - Spanish Version.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire Version III and Establishment of Benchmarks for Psychosocial Risk Management in Sweden.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.