Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31682147›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2020

An ecological momentary episodic future thinking intervention on mother's weekly food purchases.

Kelseanna Hollis-Hansen, Jennifer Seidman, Sara O'Donnell, Amber Wedderburn, Sanja Stanar, Spencer Brande, Leonard H Epstein

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kelseanna Hollis-HansenDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo.ORCID 0000-0002-0243-2830
Jennifer SeidmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo.
Sara O'DonnellDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo.
Amber WedderburnDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo.
Sanja StanarDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo.
Spencer BrandeDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo.
Leonard H EpsteinDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo.
Jacobs (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Using prospection to improve obesity treatmentR01HD080292 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD080292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImagining one's own future (episodic future thinking, EFT) has helped mothers with overweight purchase healthier groceries during an online shopping task in the laboratory. The present study explored whether delivering an EFT intervention to participants' devices via an ecological momentary intervention (EMI) tool would help mothers purchase healthier food at brick-and-mortar stores.

methodParticipants (N = 43, mothers 31-52 years of age, BMI ≥ 24.9 kg/m2) were randomized to EFT or standardized episodic thinking (SET). EFT cues include a positive and vivid description of future events while SET cues focus on the recent experience of playing games in the laboratory. Cues were uploaded to participant profiles on an EMI site. Participants were trained on how to read and listen to cues as well as how to detail purchases. Participants received text reminders to listen to cues before shopping and returned with receipts the following day. Receipt data was analyzed to derive dependent variables, calories, and nutrients purchased per person. Correlations were used to analyze associations between study variables of interest, and ANOVAs were conducted to compare dietary variables by group.

resultsParticipants in the EFT group purchased fewer calories, fewer grams of fat, fewer grams of saturated fat, and fewer miligrams of sodium than participants in the SET control group.

conclusionDelivering EFT cues to participant devices may be a promising way to improve the calorie and nutrient content of food purchases. Future research should include a longer follow-up and analyze calorie changes over time. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Delay DiscountingAdultFemaleFoodFood SupplyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMothersOverweight

Identifiers

PMID31682147
PMCPMC7117870
OpenAlexW2988378834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.