Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31682083›Full record

ArticleJournal of renal care2020

Systematic Fluid Assessment in Haemodialysis: Development and Validation of A Decision Aid.

Jenny Stenberg, David Keane, Magnus Lindberg, Hans Furuland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of renal care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Volume Assessment in Patients Undergoing Long-Term Dialysis.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenny StenbergDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2408-0087
David KeaneDepartment of Renal Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4744-4106
Magnus LindbergDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1289-9896
Hans FurulandDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9001-614X

Funding

Uppsala County Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout a third of patients undergoing haemodialysis have poorly controlled fluid status, which may affect survival. Clinical assessment is subjective and imprecise, which has led to the increasing use of devices based on bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). However, BIS cannot provide a simple target applicable to all patients. Our aim was to develop and validate a decision aid combining clinical assessment of fluid status with information from BIS in target weight determination.

methodsThe decision aid was based on empirical experience and a literature review identifying physiological parameters already used in the clinical assessment of fluid status. Content validity was established by patient representatives, interdisciplinary stakeholders and external experts, who assessed item relevance and comprehensiveness. Reliability was assessed by inter-rater agreement analysis between nurses assessing typical patient cases.

resultsThe decision aid for Recognition and Correction of Volume Alterations (RECOVA) consists of three parts (1) a scoring system; (2) thresholds and triggers; (3) a decision aid algorithm. Agreement between raters in the assessment of symptoms was almost perfect, with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.90. Agreement in clinical response was only fair, but increased to moderate, with training and self-reported confidence.

conclusionRECOVA may enable systematic clinical assessment of fluid status, facilitating early recognition of fluid alterations, and incorporation of bioimpedance into target weight management. However, implementation into clinical practice will require training of staff. Clinical intervention studies are required to evaluate if RECOVA facilitates response to and correction of recognised fluid alterations.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRenal DialysisReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexWater-Electrolyte BalanceBioimpedanceFluid managementHaemodialysisOverhydrationValidation

Identifiers

PMID31682083
PMCPMC7328711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.