ReviewScience advances2019
The science of contemporary street protest: New efforts in the United States.
Review in Science advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Far-right music events, protests, and violence: a county-level dataset for Germany, 2013-2024.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Most people who agree with you won't protest: Predictors of marches and demonstrations from six decades of research.Science advances · 2026Review
- Quantifying social media predictors of violence during the 6 January US Capitol insurrection using Granger causality.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Differentiation in Protest Politics: Participation by Political Insiders and Outsiders.Political behavior · 2023Article
- How Social Ties with Undocumented Immigrants Motivate Latinx Political Participation.Political research quarterly · 2022Article
- Intersectionality within the racial justice movement in the summer of 2020.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- "Race was something we didn't talk about": Racial Socialization in Asian American Families.Family relations · 2021Article
- Political events and public views on climate change.Climatic change · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the inauguration of Donald Trump, there has been substantial and ongoing protest against the Administration. Street demonstrations are some of the most visible forms of opposition to the Administration and its policies. This article reviews the two most central methods for studying street protest on a large scale: building comprehensive event databases and conducting field surveys of participants at demonstrations. After discussing the broader development of these methods, this article provides a detailed assessment of recent and ongoing projects studying the current wave of contention. Recommendations are offered to meet major challenges, including making data publicly available in near real time, increasing the validity and reliability of event data, expanding the scope of crowd surveys, and integrating ongoing projects in a meaningful way by building new research infrastructure.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.