Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31681801›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2019

Antimicrobial Use on 36 Beef Feedlots in Western Canada: 2008-2012.

Stephanie A Brault, Sherry J Hannon, Sheryl P Gow, Brian N Warr, Jessica Withell, Jiming Song, Christina M Williams, Simon J G Otto, Calvin W Booker, Paul S Morley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Seasonal and spatial dynamics ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  3. Evaluation of recombinase polymerase amplification assays for targeted detection of bovine respiratory disease bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial-resistance genes in feedlot calves.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Health outcomes following antimicrobial treatment of septic arthritis in Canadian feedlot calves.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antimicrobial use in animal farms in Egypt: rates, patterns, and determinants.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie A BraultDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biological Sciences, State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Sherry J HannonFeedlot Health Management Services Ltd., Okotoks, AB, Canada.
Sheryl P GowCanadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance, Public Health Agency Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Brian N WarrFeedlot Health Management Services Ltd., Okotoks, AB, Canada.
Jessica WithellFeedlot Health Management Services Ltd., Okotoks, AB, Canada.
Jiming SongFeedlot Health Management Services Ltd., Okotoks, AB, Canada.
Christina M WilliamsFeedlot Health Management Services Ltd., Okotoks, AB, Canada.
Simon J G OttoSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Calvin W BookerFeedlot Health Management Services Ltd., Okotoks, AB, Canada.
Paul S MorleyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biological Sciences, State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Alberta Health Services · CAColorado State University · USPublic Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate quantification of antimicrobial use (AMU) in production animals is critical for monitoring trends in exposure to antimicrobial drugs (AMD) over time and examining potential associations with antimicrobial resistance in bacteria. In this study, a census sample of cattle was used to quantify individually-dosed and in-feed AMU as both numbers of animal daily doses (nADD) and total grams of AMD (gAMD) used in cattle placed in 36 western Canadian feedlots between 1-November, 2008 and 31-October, 2012; representing about 21.5% of fed cattle in Canada during that time period. Of the ~2.6 million cattle placed during the 48-month period, 45% were calves, 63% were male, 62% arrived in the fall or winter, and 39% were assessed as high risk for developing bovine respiratory disease (BRD). The proportion of cattle categorized as high risk (HR) for developing BRD was consistent over the 4 years of placement cohorts. Both medically important AMU and ionophore use were summarized but presented separately. A decrease in AMU was observed over the study period, both as nADD and total gAMD, which was primarily driven by a decline in the in-feed administration of tetracyclines. Most in-feed AMU was directed toward prevention and control of liver abscesses. The majority of individually dosed AMU was administered as metaphylaxis to address BRD risks, with category III AMD (medium importance to human medicine as categorized by Health Canada Veterinary Drugs Directorate) used most frequently. Not surprisingly, risk level for developing BRD influenced parenteral AMD exposures, with 95% of cattle categorized as being HR for developing BRD receiving individually dosed AMD compared to 59% of cattle categorized as being low risk (LR) for developing BRD. Cattle categorized as HR for developing BRD were more likely to receive macrolides for BRD metaphylaxis compared to cattle categorized as LR for developing BRD, and cattle categorized as LR for developing BRD were more likely to receive tetracycline for the same purpose. In summary, these data provide an unprecedented representation of AMU in fed cattle in western Canada and direction for future monitoring of AMU in fed cattle.

Indexed as

antimicrobial usebovine respiratory diseaseCanadafeedlot cattlequantification

Identifiers

PMID31681801
PMCPMC6811515
OpenAlexW2974366693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.