Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31681727›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2019

Kinetic Analysis by Affinity Chromatography.

Sazia Iftekhar, Susan T Ovbude, David S Hage

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sazia IftekharDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Susan T OvbudeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
David S HageDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.

Funding

CHROMATOGRAPHIC AUTOMATION OF IMMUNOASSAYSR01GM044931 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI HAGE, DAVID S · 1998 to 2014
$2.7M
CHROMATOGRAPHIC STUDIES OF FUNCTIONAL PROTEOMICSR01DK069629 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI HAGE, DAVID S · 2006 to 2017
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK069629NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Important information on chemical processes in living systems can be obtained by the rates at which these biological interactions occur. This review will discuss several techniques based on traditional and high-performance affinity chromatography that may be used to examine the kinetics of biological reactions. These methods include band-broadening measurements, techniques for peak fitting, split-peak analysis, peak decay studies, and ultrafast affinity extraction. The general principles and theory of each method, as applied to the determination of rate constants, will be discussed. The applications of each approach, along with its advantages and limitations, will also be considered.

Indexed as

affinity chromatographybiological interactionskineticspeak decay methodpeak profilingplate height methodsplit-peak methodultrafast affinity extraction

Identifiers

PMID31681727
PMCPMC6813734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.