Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31681720›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2019

Describing the Development of a Health State Valuation Protocol to Obtain Community-Derived Disability Weights.

Eunice Lobo, Lipika Nanda, Shuchi Sree Akhouri, Chandni Shrivastava, Roshan Ronghang, Geetha R Menon, Ambarish Dutta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eunice LoboIndian Institute of Public Health- Bhubaneswar, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, India.
Lipika NandaIndian Institute of Public Health- Bhubaneswar, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, India.
Shuchi Sree AkhouriIndian Institute of Public Health- Bhubaneswar, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, India.
Chandni ShrivastavaIndian Institute of Public Health- Bhubaneswar, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, India.
Roshan RonghangIndian Institute of Public Health- Bhubaneswar, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, India.
Geetha R MenonNational Institute of Medical Statistics, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Ambarish DuttaIndian Institute of Public Health- Bhubaneswar, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the prioritization of the allocation of national resources, estimating the burden of disease studies play a critical role. Hence the first Global Burden of Disease study conducted in the 1990s was done for this particular estimation. By the means of introducing disability-adjusted life year (DALY) metric, the burden of various diseases was calculated using disability weights (DWs)-a component of DALY. DWs are values that capture individuals' perception regarding the severity of diseases that involve valuation tools and health state descriptions. Various studies have been conducted over the past few decades to evaluate health states and derive disease-specific disability weights using Person-Trade off, Time-trade off, etc. However, use of these complex and cognitively demanding methods has been carried out in developed countries where the bulk of the populace is more educated. Few attempts have been made in low- and middle-income countries such as India, where not only the majority is less educated but also the social construction of diseases and health conditions are diverse. Therefore, due to the absence of methodological protocols of health state valuations for application at the community-level in the developing world, we attempted to systematically describe the procedure that can be used universally and cross-culturally for various health states. We began with the tentative selection of health states and health states valuation methods by conducting a meticulous literature review, followed by community exploration and medical consultations. This led to developing vignettes (clinical description) and 6D5L pictorial narrations (functional status description). Two field tests for checking the usability and refinement of the tools was done. Final consultation by an expert panel comprising of medical and non-medical professionals was held/conducted to finalize the health state labels and functional status profiles of each health state. The methodical approach provides a robust and thorough procedure for guiding researchers to implement health state valuation studies at community level.

Indexed as

disability weightsdisease burdenEuroQoLhealth state valuationvisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID31681720
PMCPMC6798035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.