Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31681683›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2019

Coverage of mass drug administration for elimination of lymphatic filariasis in urban Nagpur, Central India: A mixed method study.

Sitikantha Banerjee, Kajari Bandyopadhyay, Mubashshera F Khan, Sujiv Akkilagunta, Kalaiselvi Selvaraj, Jaya P Tripathy, Ranjan Solanki, Arvind S Kushwaha, Pradeep Deshmukh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mass drug administration targetingParasite epidemiology and control · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Mass drug administration for endemic scabies: a systematic review.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sitikantha BanerjeeDepartment of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Kajari BandyopadhyayDepartment of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Mubashshera F KhanDepartment of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Sujiv AkkilaguntaDepartment of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Kalaiselvi SelvarajDepartment of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Jaya P TripathyDepartment of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Ranjan SolankiDepartment of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Arvind S KushwahaDepartment of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Pradeep DeshmukhDepartment of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsMass Drug Administration (MDA) coverage remains an important indicator in elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis (LF), especially in context of recent changes in programme strategies in India, such as incorporation of Ivermectin and involvement of urban Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs). This study aimed at assessing the coverage and compliance with MDA of Filariasis as well as exploring perspective of beneficiaries for non-consumption in selected slum area of Nagpur city.

methodsMixed-method study design comprising of quantitative assessment of MDA coverage, followed by qualitative method to explore the reasons of non-compliance was used in selected slum areas of Nagpur city. Using cluster sampling, 240 households were selected and house-to-house visits were made to interview the eligible participants. In-depth interviews were conducted among selected non-compliant participants. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify the factors associated with non-consumption. Thematic analysis was done to obtain the reasons of non-consumption as perceived by the beneficiaries.

resultsAmong the 1096 individuals studied, distribution and consumption coverage were 55.2% and 48.5%, respectively. Effective supervised consumption was further low (28.9%). Coverage compliance gap (CCG) was 12.1%. Male sex and younger age (2-5 years) were significant socio-demographic determinants of non-consumption. No repeat visit to houses left in first round, fear of side effects, pill burden, poor understanding about the need were important reasons as revealed by qualitative inquiry.

conclusionEffective pre-campaign awareness, incorporation of context specific drug delivery strategies and strengthening monitoring system are essential for successful MDA implementation.

Indexed as

Ivermectinlymphatic filariasismass drug administrationmixed-methodnon-consumption

Identifiers

PMID31681683
PMCPMC6820416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.