Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31681601›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2019

Prognostic Value of Ki-67 in Patients With Resected Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Qiang Wu, Guangzhi Ma, Yunfu Deng, Wuxia Luo, Yaqin Zhao, Wen Li, Qinghua Zhou

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qiang WuLung Cancer Center & Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Guangzhi MaLung Cancer Center & Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yunfu DengLung Cancer Center & Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wuxia LuoDepartment of Oncology, Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Yaqin ZhaoCancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wen LiLung Cancer Center & Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qinghua ZhouLung Cancer Center & Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Ki-67meta-analysisprognosisTNBCtriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID31681601
PMCPMC6811517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.