ReviewBMJ global health2019
Elements of a strategic approach for strengthening national mortality statistics programmes.
Review in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of mortality surveillance in pandemic preparedness and response.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025Article
- Comparison of HIV/AIDS death estimates for 2019 between GBD 2019 and WHO mortality databases.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Implementation research for developing Civil Registration and Vital Statistics (CRVS) Systems: lessons from Indonesia.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Coding quality of deaths and its impact on elderly unintentional fall mortality data from 1990 to 2019: a retrospective analysis of the WHO Mortality Database.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
- Mortality estimates for WHO SEAR countries: problems and prospects.BMJ global health · 2021Review
- Subnational mortality estimates for India in 2019: a baseline for evaluating excess deaths due to the COVID-19 pandemic.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Lessons Learnt and Pathways forward for National Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Systems after the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2021Article
- Premature adult mortality in India: what is the size of the matter?BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Mortality in India established through verbal autopsies (MINErVA): Strengthening national mortality surveillance system in India.Journal of global health · 2020Article
- Empiricism in non-communicable disease mortality measurement for the Asia-Pacific: lost in translation.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- Cause of Death Certification in COVID-19 Deaths.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020Review
- The civil registration system is a potentially viable data source for reliable subnational mortality measurement in India.BMJ global health · 2020Article
- Medical certification of cause of death for COVID-19.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Information on cause-specific mortality from civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems is essential for health policy and epidemiological research. Currently, there are critical gaps in the international availability of timely and reliable mortality data, which limits planned progress towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals. This article describes an evidence-based strategic approach for strengthening mortality data from CRVS systems. National mortality data availability scores from the Global Burden of Disease study were used to group countries into those with adequate, partial or negligible mortality data. These were further categorised by geographical region and population size, which showed that there were shortcomings in availability of mortality data in approximately two-thirds of all countries. Existing frameworks for evaluating design and functional status of mortality components of CRVS systems were reviewed to identify themes and topics for assessment. Detailed national programme assessments can be used to investigate systemic issues that are likely to affect death reporting, cause of death ascertainment and data management. Assessment findings can guide interventions to strengthen system performance. The strategic national approach should be customised according to data availability and population size and supported by human and institutional capacity building. Countries with larger populations should use an incremental sampling approach to strengthen CRVS systems and use interim data for mortality estimation. Periodic data quality evaluation is required to monitor system performance and scale up interventions. A comprehensive implementation and operations research programme should be concurrently launched to evaluate the feasibility, success and sustainability of system strengthening activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.