Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31681410›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019

Analysis of Single Nucleotide Variants in CRISPR-Cas9 Edited Zebrafish Exomes Shows No Evidence of Off-Target Inflation.

Marie R Mooney, Erica E Davis, Nicholas Katsanis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. HomozygousMolecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. TALENs-an indispensable tool in the era of CRISPR: a mini review.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  4. The genome editing revolution: review.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Translational Toxicology in Zebrafish.Current opinion in toxicology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marie R MooneyCenter for Human Disease Modeling, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Erica E DavisCenter for Human Disease Modeling, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Nicholas KatsanisCenter for Human Disease Modeling, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

Genetic and Functional Studies of Human Ciliary SyndromesR01DK072301 · NIDDK · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI DAVIS, ERICA ELLEN · 2005 to 2022
$7.2M
Preparing Genetic Counselors for Genomic Medicine ResearchT32HG008955 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COONEY, KATHLEEN A, HAGA, SUSANNE · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG008955NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK072301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic applications of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing have spurred innovation in Cas9 enzyme engineering and single guide RNA (sgRNA) design algorithms to minimize potential off-target events. While recent work in rodents outlines favorable conditions for specific editing and uses a trio design (mother, father, offspring) to control for the contribution of natural genome variation, the potential for CRISPR-Cas9 to induce

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas9de novo mutationexomeoff-target effectzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID31681410
PMCPMC6797590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.