Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31681348›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019

Assessing Extreme Seed Longevity: The Value of Historic Botanical Collections to Modern Research.

Gareth Porteous, Mark Nesbitt, Jonathan P Kendon, Christina J Prychid, Wolfgang Stuppy, Maria Conejero, Daniel Ballesteros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gareth PorteousScience Directorate, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom.
Mark NesbittScience Directorate, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan P KendonScience Directorate, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom.
Christina J PrychidScience Directorate, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom.
Wolfgang StuppyScience Directorate, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom.
Maria ConejeroScience Directorate, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel BallesterosScience Directorate, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Botanical, historical, and archaeological collections have been the source of extraordinarily long-lived seeds, which have been used to revive extinct genotypes or species. The longest-lived example of a viable seed of known age is the date palm,

Indexed as

agingancient seedsbotanical collectionsdifferential scanning calorimetry (DSC)historic collectionsin vitro cultureseed germinationtransmission electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID31681348
PMCPMC6802001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.