Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31681193›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

The Effect of

Ting Huang, Xin-Yu Peng, Biao Gao, Qi-Lin Wei, Rong Xiang, Ming-Gui Yuan, Zhi-Hong Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Neuroprotective effect of engineeredBioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ting HuangInstitute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Xin-Yu PengInstitute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Biao GaoInstitute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Qi-Lin WeiInstitute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Rong XiangInstitute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Ming-Gui YuanInstitute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Zhi-Hong XuInstitute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNKey Laboratory of Guangdong Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotic enteritis (NE) causes huge economic losses to the poultry industry. Probiotics are used as potential alternatives to antibiotics to prevent NE. It is known that

Indexed as

Clostridium butyricumClostridium perfringensgut microbiotaintestine barriermucosal immunitynecrotic enteritis

Identifiers

PMID31681193
PMCPMC6797560
OpenAlexW2980276035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.