ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019
Rasch Validation of the Arabic Version of the Behavioral Intention to Interact With Peers With Intellectual Disability Scale.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rasch and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the Arabic Version of the Diabetes Self-Management Scale (DSMS): An Intercultural Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Rasch validation of the Arabic version of the beach center family quality of life scale (BCFQOL-AR).Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the construct validity of the Arabic version of the behavioral intention to interact with peers using an intellectual disability (ID) scale. Rasch analysis was used to examine the psychometric properties of the scale. The sample contained 290 elementary students in Saudi Arabia (56% were girls and 44% were boys). Several parameters were examined: overall fit, item fit, person fit, assumption of local independence, and the scale's unidimensionality. Eight items were rescored, 22 misfit persons were removed, and no item with differential item functioning (DIF) was detected. Disordered thresholds were detected in eight items. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency [person separation index (PSI) 0.80] and fulfilled all the requirements of the Rasch model. After rescoring the eight items, Rasch analysis supported the scale's unidimensionality to measure children's behavioral intention to interact with peers with ID. The Arabic version of the scale, with the proposed scoring, could be a useful tool to measure children's behavioral intention to interact with peers with ID. Further studies with different samples are warranted to confirm the study's findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.