Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31681117›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019

Comparing Traditional and Digitized Cognitive Tests Used in Standard Clinical Evaluation - A Study of the Digital Application Minnemera.

Stina Björngrim, Wobbie van den Hurk, Moises Betancort, Alejandra Machado, Maria Lindau

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04714528 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Physical Activity as Treatment for Depression and Anxiety Towards Affordable Preventive Healthcare - a Randomised Controlled Study (RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion Örebro CountyRan2020 to 2026Enrolled87ConditionsDepression, AnxietyArmsPhysical Exercise, Relaxation Therapy
NCT05819008 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Remote Neuropsychological Assessment of Patients With Neurological Disorders and Injuries

TypeobservationalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2023 to 2027Enrolled350ConditionsTraumatic Brain Injury, Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson DiseaseArmsNeuropsychological Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Remote Neuropsychological Testing as an Alternative to Traditional Methods-a Convergent Validity Study.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stina BjörngrimDepartment of Psychology, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Wobbie van den HurkMindmore AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Moises BetancortDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, University of La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
Alejandra MachadoMindmore AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria LindauDepartment of Psychology, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare a new digitized cognitive test battery, Minnemera, with its correspondent traditional paper-based cognitive tests. Eighty-one healthy adults between the ages of 21 and 85 participated in the study. Participants performed the two different test versions (traditional paper-based and digitized) with an interval of four weeks between the tests. Test presentation (the order of the test versions presented) was counterbalanced in order to control for any possible test learning effects. The digitized tests were constructed so that there were only minor differences when compared to the traditional paper-based tests. Test results from the paper-based and digitized versions of the cognitive screening were compared within individuals by means of a correlation analysis and equivalence tests. The effects of demographic variables (age, gender and level of education) and test presentation were explored for each test measure and each test version through linear regression models. For each test measure, a significant correlation between traditional and digitized version was observed ranging between

Indexed as

cognitiondigitized assessmentequivalence testneuropsychologyscreening batteryvalidity

Identifiers

PMID31681117
PMCPMC6813236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.