ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2019
Importance of Quality Assessment in Clinical Research in Japan.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The development of QERM scoring system for comprehensive assessment of the Quality of Empirical Research in Medicine - Part 1.Journal of postgraduate medicinePooled it
- Identifying and Deploying Benchmarks for Clinical Research at Sites.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional survey on principal investigators' clinical research knowledge in Japan.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Clinical Research Support Activities in Core Clinical Research Hospitals Throughout Japan.Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal · 2022Article
- The association between research funding status and clinical research papers' citation impact in Japan: A cross-sectional bibliometric study.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- The relationship between contributions of authors and author order.Journal of general and family medicine · 2021Article
- Performance Index for Types of Clinical Research Support Service Providers for Academic Research Organizations in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Differences in author ranking: Development of SIGAPS scoring system for Japanese version.Journal of general and family medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.