Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31680843›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Neural Effects of Gender and Age Interact in Reading.

William W Graves, Linsah Coulanges, Hillary Levinson, Olga Boukrina, Lisa L Conant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William W GravesDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ, United States.
Linsah CoulangesDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ, United States.
Hillary LevinsonDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University-Newark, Newark, NJ, United States.
Olga BoukrinaCenter for Stroke Rehabilitation Research, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, United States.
Lisa L ConantDepartment of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR031973 · NCRR · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SHAKER, REZA NONE · 2010 to 2011
$7.9M
Neural systems for word recognition in space and timeR00HD065839 · NICHD · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI GRAVES, WILLIAM W · 2012 to 2014
$696k
Neural systems for word recognition in space and timeK99HD065839 · NICHD · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI GRAVES, WILLIAM W · 2010 to 2011
$179k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR031973NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD065839NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD065839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been an enduring fascination with the possibility of gender differences in the brain basis of language, yet the evidence has been largely equivocal. Evidence does exist, however, for women being at greater risk than men for developing psychomotor slowing and even Alzheimer disease with advancing age, although this may in part at least be due to women living longer. We examined whether gender, age, or their interaction influenced language-related or more general processes in reading. Reading consists of elements related to language, such as the processing of word sound patterns (phonology) and meanings (semantics), along with the lead-in processes of visual perception and orthographic (visual word form) processing that are specific to reading. To test for any influence of gender and age on either semantic processing or orthography-phonology mapping, we tested for an interaction of these factors on differences between meaningful words and meaningless but pronounceable non-words. We also tested for effects of gender and age on how the number of letters in a word modulates neural activity for reading. This lead-in process presumably relates most to orthography. Behaviorally, reading accuracy declined with age for both men and women, but the decline was steeper for men. Neurally, interactions between gender and age were found exclusively in medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC). These factors influenced the word-non-word contrast, but not the parametric effect of number of letters. Men showed increasing activation with age for non-words compared to words. Women showed only slightly decreasing activation with age for novel letter strings. Overall, we found interactive effects of gender and age in the mOFC on the left primarily for novel letter strings, but no such interaction for a contrast that emphasized visual form processing. Thus the interaction of gender with age in the mOFC may relate most to orthography-phonology conversion for unfamiliar letter strings. More generally, this suggests that efforts to investigate effects of gender on language-related tasks may benefit from taking into account age and the type of cognitive process being highlighted.

Indexed as

agecognitive neurosciencefunctional magnetic resonance imaginggenderorbitofrontal cortexorthographyreadingsemantics

Identifiers

PMID31680843
PMCPMC6812500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.