Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31680418›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2020

Interspecies differences in protein expression do not impact the spatiotemporal regulation of glycoprotein VI mediated activation.

Joanne L Dunster, Amanda J Unsworth, Alexander P Bye, Elizabeth J Haining, Marcin A Sowa, Ying Di, Tanya Sage, Chiara Pallini, Jeremy A Pike, Alexander T Hardy and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Platelet Membrane Receptors and Signalling Pathways.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Joanne L DunsterInstitute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research (ICMR), School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Amanda J UnsworthInstitute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research (ICMR), School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Alexander P ByeInstitute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research (ICMR), School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Elizabeth J HainingInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences (ICVS), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Marcin A SowaInstitute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research (ICMR), School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Ying DiInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences (ICVS), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tanya SageInstitute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research (ICMR), School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Chiara PalliniInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences (ICVS), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jeremy A PikeCentre of Membrane Proteins and Receptors (COMPARE), Universities of Birmingham and Nottingham, Midlands, Birmingham, UK.
Alexander T HardyInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences (ICVS), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Bernhard NieswandtDepartment of Experimental Biomedicine, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Ángel GarcíaPlatelet Proteomics Group, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Steve P WatsonInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences (ICVS), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Natalie S PoulterInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences (ICVS), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jonathan M GibbinsInstitute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research (ICMR), School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Alice Y PollittInstitute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research (ICMR), School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8706-5154
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Reading · GBUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESManchester Metropolitan University · GBUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH0/003British Heart Foundation FS/15/71/31677British Heart Foundation PG/13/93/30593British Heart Foundation PG/16/20/32074British Heart Foundation RG/13/18/30563British Heart Foundation RG/15/2/31224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate protein quantification is a vital prerequisite for generating meaningful predictions when using systems biology approaches, a method that is increasingly being used to unravel the complexities of subcellular interactions and as part of the drug discovery process. Quantitative proteomics, flow cytometry, and western blotting have been extensively used to define human platelet protein copy numbers, yet for mouse platelets, a model widely used for platelet research, evidence is largely limited to a single proteomic dataset in which the total amount of proteins was generally comparatively higher than those found in human platelets.

objectivesTo investigate the functional implications of discrepancies between levels of mouse and human proteins in the glycoprotein VI (GPVI) signalling pathway using a systems pharmacology model of GPVI.

methodsThe protein copy number of mouse platelet receptors was determined using flow cytometry. The Virtual Platelet, a mathematical model of GPVI signalling, was used to determine the consequences of protein copy number differences observed between human and mouse platelets. RESULTS AND

conclusionDespite the small size of mouse platelets compared to human platelets they possessed a greater density of surface receptors alongside a higher concentration of intracellular signalling proteins. Surprisingly the predicted temporal profile of Syk activity was similar in both species with predictions supported experimentally. Super resolution microscopy demonstrates that the spatial distribution of Syk is similar between species, suggesting that the spatial distribution of receptors and signalling molecules in activated platelets, rather than their copy number, is important for signalling pathway regulation.

Indexed as

Platelet Membrane GlycoproteinsProteomicsAnimalsBlood PlateletsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMicePlatelet ActivationSignal TransductionIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPlatelet Membrane GlycoproteinsGPVImathematical modellingplateletSyk

Identifiers

PMID31680418
PMCPMC7027541
OpenAlexW2986491007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.