ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2019
Cell Therapy-a Basic Science Primer for the Sports Medicine Clinician.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vitro responses to platelet-rich-plasma are associated with variable clinical outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- The global regulatory landscape of stem cell medical aesthetics: challenges, comparisons, and pathways to coordination.Stem cells translational medicine · 2026Review
- Combined Subacromial Bursal Stem Cell Therapy and Platelet-Rich Plasma Alongside Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery Reduces Postoperative Pain and Improves Functional Outcomes: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of silver nanoparticles and human platelet rich-plasma versus traditional therapy in the treatment of murine chronic toxoplasmosis.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Patient Preference and Perception Regarding the Clinical Use of Autologous Versus Allogeneic Cell Therapy in Orthopedic Surgery.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe emergence of cell-based therapies has brought much excitement to the field of orthopedic sports medicine. However, the significant inconsistency of reporting has led to the poor understanding, misinformation, and false expectations for patients and clinicians alike. In this paper, we aim to clarify the available cell-therapy treatments and summarize some of the latest research. RECENT
findingsAlthough this technology is in early development, our understanding of cell biology has grown significantly over the last decade. Furthermore, it is becoming evident that tissue specificity may play a significant role in determining the effectiveness and overall clinical benefit attributed to cell therapy. Cell therapy is an emerging field with tremendous potential for clinically significant benefit. However, in its current state, clinical application of these treatments is limited by federal regulations, variability in formulation, and limited understanding of the biologic activity of various cell formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.