Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31680160›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2020

ELM-the eukaryotic linear motif resource in 2020.

Manjeet Kumar, Marc Gouw, Sushama Michael, Hugo Sámano-Sánchez, Rita Pancsa, Juliana Glavina, Athina Diakogianni, Jesús Alvarado Valverde, Dayana Bukirova, Jelena Čalyševa and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 195 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
195citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

195 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

135 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Manjeet KumarStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Marc GouwStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Sushama MichaelStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Hugo Sámano-SánchezStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Rita PancsaInstitute of Enzymology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest 1117, Hungary.
Juliana GlavinaInstituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas (IIBio) and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Av. 25 de Mayo y Francia, CP1650, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Athina DiakogianniStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Jesús Alvarado ValverdeStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Dayana BukirovaStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Jelena ČalyševaStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.
Nicolas PalopoliDepartment of Science and Technology, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes - CONICET, Bernal B1876BXD, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Norman E DaveyThe Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, 237 Fulham Rd, Chelsea, London SW3 6JB, UK.
Lucía B ChemesInstituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas (IIBio) and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Av. 25 de Mayo y Francia, CP1650, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Toby J GibsonStructural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg 69117, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The eukaryotic linear motif (ELM) resource is a repository of manually curated experimentally validated short linear motifs (SLiMs). Since the initial release almost 20 years ago, ELM has become an indispensable resource for the molecular biology community for investigating functional regions in many proteins. In this update, we have added 21 novel motif classes, made major revisions to 12 motif classes and added >400 new instances mostly focused on DNA damage, the cytoskeleton, SH2-binding phosphotyrosine motifs and motif mimicry by pathogenic bacterial effector proteins. The current release of the ELM database contains 289 motif classes and 3523 individual protein motif instances manually curated from 3467 scientific publications. ELM is available at: http://elm.eu.org.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsEukaryotaApicoplastsCytoskeletonDatabases, ProteinDNA DamagePhosphotyrosinesrc Homology DomainsPhosphotyrosine

Identifiers

PMID31680160
PMCPMC7145657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.