ArticleSexual medicine2020
Predictors for Low Frequencies of Patient-Physician Conversations Concerning Sexual Health at an Austrian University Hospital.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding access to sexual and reproductive health in general practice using an adapted Candidacy Framework: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Pooled it
- Quality of Nursing Care: Addressing Sexuality as Part of Prostate Cancer Management, an Umbrella Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Pooled it
- Practices and attitudes of Israeli obstetrician-gynecologists regarding female sexual health: results from a national survey.Sexual medicine · 2025Article
- Sexuality and society in the medical context: Conceptualization, implementation and evaluation of a student-led elective course in medical school at Leipzig University.GMS journal for medical education · 2025Article
- Women's sexual health improvement: sexual quality of life and pelvic floor muscle assessment in asymptomatic women.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Perceived influence of medical school sexual health education on specialty selection in young urologists specializing in sexual dysfunction.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- Discussing sexual health among Flemish patients with Parkinson's disease.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2023Article
- Sexual dysfunction as a challenge in treated breast cancer: in-depth analysis and risk assessment to improve individual outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStudies concerning barriers to patient-physician conversations about sexual health or, specifically, sexual functioning fail to go beyond descriptive analyses of such barriers.
aimTo identify barriers that predict the frequency of patient-physician conversations concerning sexual health or sexual functioning.
methodsAn online survey among physicians was conducted at an Austrian university hospital. Self-constructed questionnaires assessed physicians' sociodemographic information, frequency of holding a discussion on sexual health or sexual dysfunctions with their patients, and self-perceived barriers to asking patients about sexual health. Stepwise logistic regression models determined barriers that predicted the frequency of patient-physician conversations concerning sexual health or sexual dysfunctions in everyday clinical practice.
main outcome measureThe outcome variables in the structural equation models were frequency of patient-physician conversations concerning sexual health or sexual dysfunctions in everyday clinical practice.
resultsOne hundred two physicians (53.9% women, 46.1% men; mean age = 41.3 years; SD = 10.6) provided full responses. Of these physicians, 61.8% reported having a discussion on sexual health or sexual dysfunctions with their patients at least rarely in their everyday clinical practice. The barriers most influencing the frequency of such patient-physician conversations were not feeling responsible for this health issue and expecting the patient to initiate such a conversation. Fear of offending the patient and the physician's own feelings of shame and discomfort were additional factors influencing the frequency of these patient-physician conversations. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Future physician training should address physicians' responsibilities that include sexual health. Future physician training should also help physicians in overcoming fears of offending a patient, and one's own feelings of shame and discomfort when addressing patients' sexual health. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study included physicians across a range of disciplines, who may encounter patients with sexual problems and with their treatments influence a patient's sexual health and sexual functioning. However, the low response rate and the limited number of participants prevented generalization of findings.
conclusionsAt an Austrian university hospital, patient-physician conversations concerning sexual health are seldom part of a physician's everyday clinical practice. Future training for physicians should focus on demonstrating the relevance of sexual health in the physician's medical discipline and should tackle a physician's feelings of shame or how to handle patients' negative reactions during patient-physician conversations concerning sexual health. Komlenac N, Hochleitner M. Predictors for Low Frequencies of Patient-Physician Conversations Concerning Sexual Health at an Austrian University Hospital. Sex Med 2019; 8:100-106.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.