Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31680029›Full record

ArticleSexual medicine2020

Predictors for Low Frequencies of Patient-Physician Conversations Concerning Sexual Health at an Austrian University Hospital.

Nikola Komlenac, Margarethe Hochleitner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nikola KomlenacGender Medicine Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: nikola.komlenac@i-med.ac.at.
Margarethe HochleitnerGender Medicine Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStudies concerning barriers to patient-physician conversations about sexual health or, specifically, sexual functioning fail to go beyond descriptive analyses of such barriers.

aimTo identify barriers that predict the frequency of patient-physician conversations concerning sexual health or sexual functioning.

methodsAn online survey among physicians was conducted at an Austrian university hospital. Self-constructed questionnaires assessed physicians' sociodemographic information, frequency of holding a discussion on sexual health or sexual dysfunctions with their patients, and self-perceived barriers to asking patients about sexual health. Stepwise logistic regression models determined barriers that predicted the frequency of patient-physician conversations concerning sexual health or sexual dysfunctions in everyday clinical practice.

main outcome measureThe outcome variables in the structural equation models were frequency of patient-physician conversations concerning sexual health or sexual dysfunctions in everyday clinical practice.

resultsOne hundred two physicians (53.9% women, 46.1% men; mean age = 41.3 years; SD = 10.6) provided full responses. Of these physicians, 61.8% reported having a discussion on sexual health or sexual dysfunctions with their patients at least rarely in their everyday clinical practice. The barriers most influencing the frequency of such patient-physician conversations were not feeling responsible for this health issue and expecting the patient to initiate such a conversation. Fear of offending the patient and the physician's own feelings of shame and discomfort were additional factors influencing the frequency of these patient-physician conversations. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Future physician training should address physicians' responsibilities that include sexual health. Future physician training should also help physicians in overcoming fears of offending a patient, and one's own feelings of shame and discomfort when addressing patients' sexual health. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: This study included physicians across a range of disciplines, who may encounter patients with sexual problems and with their treatments influence a patient's sexual health and sexual functioning. However, the low response rate and the limited number of participants prevented generalization of findings.

conclusionsAt an Austrian university hospital, patient-physician conversations concerning sexual health are seldom part of a physician's everyday clinical practice. Future training for physicians should focus on demonstrating the relevance of sexual health in the physician's medical discipline and should tackle a physician's feelings of shame or how to handle patients' negative reactions during patient-physician conversations concerning sexual health. Komlenac N, Hochleitner M. Predictors for Low Frequencies of Patient-Physician Conversations Concerning Sexual Health at an Austrian University Hospital. Sex Med 2019; 8:100-106.

Indexed as

Barriers to Patient-Physician ConversationsHospitalPatient-Physician ConversationsPhysicianSexual DysfunctionsSexual Health

Identifiers

PMID31680029
PMCPMC7042158
OpenAlexW2988868403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.