Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31679987›Full record

ReviewTrends in molecular medicine2020

The 3D Genome as a Target for Anticancer Therapy.

Omar L Kantidze, Katerina V Gurova, Vasily M Studitsky, Sergey V Razin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in molecular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cohesin regulation and roles in chromosome structure and function.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Three-Dimensional Gene Regulation Network in Glioblastoma Ferroptosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. DNA G-Quadruplexes Contribute to CTCF Recruitment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Omar L KantidzeLaboratory of Genome Stability, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. Electronic address: kantidze@gmail.com.
Katerina V GurovaDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Vasily M StuditskyCancer Epigenetics Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Sergey V RazinLaboratory of Genome Stability, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia; Laboratory of Structural and Functional Organization of Chromosomes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. Electronic address: sergey.v.razin@usa.net.

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Modulation of cancer specific transcriptional factors with small moleculesR01CA197967 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI GUROVA, KATERINA V · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
Mechanism of yFACT Action during Chromatin TranscriptionR01GM119398 · NIGMS · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI STILLMAN, DAVID J, STUDITSKY, VASILY M · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197967NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM119398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of 3D genome organization in the precise regulation of gene expression is well established. Accordingly, the mechanistic connections between 3D genome alterations and disease development are becoming increasingly apparent. This opinion article provides a snapshot of our current understanding of the 3D genome alterations associated with cancers. We discuss potential connections of the 3D genome and cancer transcriptional addiction phenomenon as well as molecular mechanisms of action of 3D genome-disrupting drugs. Finally, we highlight issues and perspectives raised by the discovery of the first pharmaceutical strongly affecting 3D genome organization.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsChromatinDNAEpigenomicsGenomeHumansNeoplasmsSmall Molecule LibrariesTranscription, GeneticAntineoplastic AgentsChromatinDNASmall Molecule Libraries3D genomechromatin damageCTCFcuraxinstopologically associating domains (TADs)transcriptional addiction

Identifiers

PMID31679987
PMCPMC9929230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.