Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31679554›Full record

ArticleCardiology in the young2019

Estimating radiation exposure during paediatric cardiac catheterisation: a potential for radiation reduction with air gap technique.

Reid C Chamberlain, Alexis C Shindhelm, Chu Wang, Gregory A Fleming, Kevin D Hill

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiology in the young, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Reid C ChamberlainDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3733-2856
Alexis C ShindhelmDepartment of Bioengineering, Duke University Pratt School of Engineering, Durham, NC, USA.
Chu WangUniversity of Pittsburgh, Radiation Safety Office, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Gregory A FlemingDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Kevin D HillDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

UNC-Duke Collaborative Clinical Pharmacology Postdoctoral Training Program-Evaluation SupplementT32GM086330 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KIM L.R. BROUWER, Daniel Gonzalez · 2011 to 2026
$8.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM086330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe air gap technique (AGT) is an approach to radiation dose optimisation during fluoroscopy where an "air gap" is used in place of an anti-scatter grid to reduce scatter irradiation. The AGT is effective in adults but remains largely untested in children. Effects are expected to vary depending on patient size and the amount of scatter irradiation produced.

methodsFluoroscopy and cineangiography were performed using a Phillips Allura Fluoroscope on tissue simulation anthropomorphic phantoms representing a neonate, 5-year-old, and teenager. Monte Carlo simulations were then used to estimate effective radiation dose first using a standard recommended imaging approach and then repeated using the AGT. Objective image quality assessments were performed using an image quality phantom.

resultsEffective radiation doses for the neonate and 5-year-old phantom increased consistently (2-92%) when the AGT was used compared to the standard recommended imaging approaches in which the anti-scatter grid is removed at baseline. In the teenage phantom, the AGT reduced effective doses by 5-59%, with greater dose reductions for imaging across the greater thoracic dimension of lateral projection. The AGT increased geometric magnification but with no detectable change in image blur or contrast differentiation.

conclusionsThe AGT is an effective approach for dose reduction in larger patients, particularly for lateral imaging. Compared to the current dose optimisation guidelines, the technique may be harmful in smaller children where scatter irradiation is minimal.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageScattering, RadiationAdolescentCardiac CatheterizationChild, PreschoolComputer SimulationFluoroscopyHumansInfantMonte Carlo MethodPediatricsPhantoms, ImagingRadiation Exposureangiographycongenitalheart defectsradiationScattering

Identifiers

PMID31679554
PMCPMC6937389
OpenAlexW2988081727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.