ArticleLa Radiologia medica2020
Caution in using 3D-EAUS as the first-line diagnostic tool in the preoperative work up for perianal fistulas.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasound for Anal Fistula: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021Pooled it
- Guidelines to diagnose and treat peri-levator high-5 anal fistulas: Supralevator, suprasphincteric, extrasphincteric, high outersphincteric, and high intrarectal fistulas.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MRI is considered the de facto imaging modality for evaluating perianal fistulas, primarily due to its excellent soft tissue contrast, operator independence, multiplanar capabilities and excellent field of view. Tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) is inferior to MRI in identifying and/or evaluating ischiorectal/supralevator tracks/extensions and therefore could end up providing incomplete and even inaccurate information (e.g. misclassification of tracks) to the surgeon, with a missed track potentially leading to recurrence of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31679127What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.